b-unicycling's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 150510835 | over 1 year ago | would leisure=swimming_area maybe be more appropriate? |
| 150531097 | over 1 year ago | The "beach" doesn't really fall under the definition on the wiki. Maybe leisure=swimming_area would be more appropriate? |
| 150356455 | over 1 year ago | no, construction work is still going on. new mapillary should be available now |
| 103797790 | over 1 year ago | Well, now, down with that sort of thing! |
| 143910283 | over 1 year ago | Oh, I see. Yes, thanks for the reminder; I haven't gotten round to documenting them. |
| 143910283 | over 1 year ago | Can you be more specific about what tags? |
| 96500189 | almost 2 years ago | I don't know; I've retagged it now. |
| 148270997 | almost 2 years ago | I'm not sure what to do about this. |
| 148682165 | almost 2 years ago | Fixed. There's a lot of unglueing of landuse from highways required in Co. Down, maybe that's what did it. |
| 98590561 | almost 2 years ago | It was never a ford, I don't know why I had mapped it as such; it's just a regular footpath. |
| 114422096 | almost 2 years ago | image link is not working for the dodie tree |
| 137338747 | almost 2 years ago | The "inscription" for the glacial erratic sounds a lot like a "description". Key should be changed, if that is the case. |
| 148029501 | almost 2 years ago | I have deleted the duplicate, thanks! |
| 147832468 | almost 2 years ago | I see what you mean, there is a wrong ref number on Wikimedia which I have deleted now. Very few lime kilns on the HEV for Kilkenny, OSM has 5 times more. |
| 147832468 | almost 2 years ago | There is no HEV link on it that I can see. Do you mean wikimedia? Did I use the wrong one? |
| 147463568 | almost 2 years ago | Danke! I might have to change a couple more. That's the trouble when using OSMAnd, it doesn't know these things. |
| 138396329 | almost 2 years ago | Tbh, don't even know if the test centre is still there, I'll try to find out. |
| 144004242 | almost 2 years ago | I was very pleased to find this mapped and walked it today, but I found it a bit misleading, because the hiking trail leaves out some of the very interesting sites like the Roman baths and the cart ruts. Would it maybe have been better to map it as a relation type=site rather than suggesting a hiking path that misses so much? It would probably also a good idea to add the inscriptions of the information board to OSM, since some of the physical ones are already very hard do read.
|
| 120617882 | almost 2 years ago | They're purpose built as tea houses in the 19th century and both vacant. I guess building=retail would work. |
| 89454978 | almost 2 years ago | thanks for pointing it out |