Hi,
I reviewed your edit as you requested. It looks good; I didn't find any issues besides a misapplied direction tag on a way (that I resolved). Thanks for helping out with this!

Hi,
When I visited Barton Corner Road a couple months ago, it was unmaintained beyond the asphalt. We tag these roads with highway=track in New Hampshire. Please see osm.wiki/New_Hampshire#8._highway.3Dtrack for more information. Also I'm not sure why you decided to delete the surface and smoothness data that I added.

Hi,
I reviewed your changeset, as you requested. I went ahead and tagged the path that you added as informal since it does not appear on the Pisgah State Park trail map. It'd be useful to also tag it with the trail_visibility tag.

Thank you for your contributions!

Hi,
Thank you for your contributions! I reviewed your edit, as you requested, and it looks correct to me.

Hi,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap, and thank you for your contributions! I reviewed your edits, as you requested. What you did looks great. At one point you asked whether addresses go on garages, and your decision was correct; addresses do not go on garages when they're a separate building from the main house. Let me know if you have any further questions.

Happy mapping!

Hi,
I reviewed your edit, as you requested. I went ahead and put the tags in the proper format. Thank you for your contribution!

Hi,
The secondary road tag is for roads of middling importance in a region's transportation network. As I'm sure you're aware, the Mount Washington Auto Road is a privately owned and operated path to the summit, as far from important as you can get. I am changing it back to unclassified.

Hi,
The southern border of Weber County runs in the middle of the channel of the Weber River. Can you please put it back?

Hi,
I reviewed your edit as you requested, and it looks quite nice. I've noticed that you've been adding a lot of buildings, and, fyi, there's a cool application called RapiD that helps with that. The data in it is several years old, so it wouldn't help with new developments like what you added in this changeset. But a lot of the time it helps speed things along. Here's a link to the entry page: https://mapwith.ai/.

Hi,
I undid this change because this stretch of roadway is still used quite often. I tagged it with ownership=private to mark that it is not a public highway. When deleting former roadways, please only do so to roadways that are no longer used and not the only way to access properties.

Hi,
There isn't a little path here. The asphalt connects through to the other side and there is a barrier. The barrier is tagged with motor_vehicle=no because it looks like it is immovable. Please stop drawing a little path here.

Hi,
In this edit you deleted a whole bunch of service roads associated with a new development off of Corporate Drive. I restored the service roads assuming that you were in error because you were looking at old imagery.

Here is a press release from the turnpike authority. Yes, the tolls are no longer collected at the entry ramp too. https://www.nh.gov/dot/media/nr2019/20191230-merrimack-toll.htm

Hi,
These look like perfectly valid paths to me. Is it against park rules to stray from marked paths in the Needles?

Hi,
I think that VT 113 from US 5 to the NH border should still be tertiary. I know state routes in VT should rarely be tertiary, but I think that this is one of those cases for a few reasons. It basically just goes to the bridge, the bridge itself is pretty sketchy, on the NH side it isn't a numbered state route, and Lyme village is quite small. It's important to have coherence at the border. Is it alright if we change it back?

Hi,
The tolls have been removed from Exit 11. Whatever data source you are using is incorrect.

Hi,
I'm not sure what you mean by linking this. It doesn't show the new street to the southwest of Tinker.

While in the editor, go to the sidebar on the right and press the Background Settings button (the one that looks like three pieces of paper stacked on top of each other). That opens a menu with a whole bunch of options for background imagery.

Hi,
You must not have gotten my message earlier, so I'll try again. Most buildings have right angles, and the editor that you are using has a few tools to help you draw correct angles. When you select a building and press "q", it will fix the angles. Or you can right click on the building and press the button that looks like a square. The squaring tool can only do so much though, and buildings should be drawn much more carefully to begin with.

Hi,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap, and thank you for your contributions! I see that you have been focusing on buildings across NH, so I wanted to give some tips on mapping them. We try to map the bases of buildings, not the roofs. Most buildings have right angles, and the editor that you are using has a few tools to help you draw correct angles. When you select a building and press "q", it will fix the angles. Or you can right click on the building and press the button that looks like a square. Also, the Bing aerial imagery isn't great in a lot of places. I recommend using Esri World Clarity, Esri World, or Mapbox imagery when tracing buildings.

Happy mapping!