OpenStreetMap
arctic-rocinante's Notes
Notes submitted or commented on by arctic-rocinante
| Id | Creator | Description | Created at | Last changed | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1393088 | Joël B | gravel |
|||
| 4844361 | Naramsim | "paid, 500 yen"
|
|||
| 3618236 | Neldo | Public Toilet |
|||
| 5032033 | arctic-rocinante | Is layer=-1 on this pond correct? It seems a bit non-standard, and is preventing at least some apps from rendering the water (CoMaps/Organic Maps). If the bridges have layer=1 I don’t think one should be needed on the pond? |
|||
| 5005104 | sirorezka | "Admission fee 800 yen"
|
|||
| 1423148 | Alexander Javoronkov | The place has gone or never existed. This is an auto-generated note from MAPS.ME application: a user reports a POI that is visible on a map (which can be outdated), but cannot be found on the ground. (OSM data version: 2017-03-28T20:59:03Z) #mapsme |
|||
| 4980883 | arctic-rocinante | Apparently this alley is not actually private, and the change was made to fix a routing problem. Context:
Is there a better way of solving this? Mapping the driveway/walkway that runs from the avenue to the property perhaps? |
|||
| 4978113 | arctic-rocinante | OSM currently has this “garden terrace” area excluded from the Royal Botanic Gardens. On-the-ground signage contradicts this though, so I think we’ve got it wrong. Botanic gardens boundary should probably come right up to the Conservatorium building? |
|||
| 4493019 | arctic-rocinante | Something wrong with how these hospital buildings are mapped (not rendering properly for some consumers, e.g. Carto). Looks like they’re all building_parts but missing the main building outlines? |
|||
| 4656726 | arctic-rocinante | The status of public access through the golf course is a bit unclear to me. I saw a “do not enter” sign, so updated a path to private access in changeset/163384892. I see many other path segments with “yes” and “permissive” access values though. Are they all outdated? Or was the sign I saw misleading/wrong? |