OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
89423327 over 5 years ago

Revert: this frequently used path (a lot of gps) passes north of, but (just) outside of plot (registerfastighet) Orust Lalleröd 2:63 (address: Lalleröd 694, S-474 96 Nösund). Part of the highway=path immediatly north of the plot is nearer than ca 70 meters and is hereby deleted on osm. Please do respect the swedish Allemansrätt (https://visitsweden.com/what-to-do/nature-outdoors/nature/sustainable-and-rural-tourism/about-the-right-of-public-access/)! You were wrong to delete the entire path.

89255588 over 5 years ago

Hi, what are your intentions with those edits?

89219148 over 5 years ago

you destroyed (partly) the multipoligon (relation/5616044). Why?

89122173 over 5 years ago

Ha, I wrote an answer to your question, which apparently got lost under some short timeout I noticed a short time ago.

Mind you tagging a street, which is non-oneway as oneway=no is no fault but unnecessary. I could think of a couple of tags, which could be applied as well: covered=no, area=no, location=outdoor etc. You see my point. Noticing that you are new here at osm - wellcome by the way - I was keen to point out this. Please take your time reading the osm-help (osm.wiki/Sv:Beginners%27_guide). You could read about implicit default values for highways as a starter (osm.wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions). If you have questions don't hesitate to ask myself or som other osm-user with some experience.

89122173 over 5 years ago

You are not sure, but assume that this is a highway, which is not oneway?

89122173 over 5 years ago

oneway=no is default. So what's the point in this tagging?

88681514 over 5 years ago

Mach dich nicht lächerlich!

changeset/87128800

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=69834

85863995 over 5 years ago

Förlåt om jag blandar mig i, men du har helt rätt joihoin, bicycle=yes är i detta fall en tautologi eller tårta på tårta. Bra att du tog bort det.

85683012 over 5 years ago

Med JOSM har du ju allt du behöver. Det här var inte så märkvärdigt. Du markerar hela skogspolygonen och då ser (eller såg) du att det fanns en snutt way för mycket.

85683012 over 5 years ago

Jag har nu fixat det.

85683012 over 5 years ago

Kolla cs way/104764487. I den allra nordligaste delen har det smugit sig in ett geometriskt fel. Kan du korrigera det, tack.

85815466 over 5 years ago

Hi, landuse=military is usualliy for state-owned military. So what's this "Staten Gunnerörd" (State of Gunneröd) ting? I would like to point out that openstreetmap is a serious project.

85720994 over 5 years ago

Ok, tack.

85720994 over 5 years ago

Du har flyttat en adressnod från en byggnad till insidan på en parkeringsplats. Om det skett av misstag v v rätta till detta. I annat fall svara på varför adressnoden skall ligga på parkeringsplatsen.

85712156 over 5 years ago

Vill du vara vänlig att svara på varför du ändrat taggningen, tack.

52166294 over 5 years ago

Please note that highway=cycleways are just for bicycles. Please read osm.wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#Default.

85756545 over 5 years ago

This cs has been reverted as these highways by default are not for foot-passage. Please look at osm.wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#Default.

85720994 over 5 years ago

Var det av misstag att du flyttade adressnoden (node/671497201)?
Flyttar du i så fall tillbaka, tack.

85712156 over 5 years ago

Är du hygglig och ändrar tillbaka till highway=path, tack!

Vill du vara vänlig att läsa detta:

highway=path#Usage_as_a_universal_tag,

samt,

access=designated (på slutet).

Tack!

85712156 over 5 years ago

Hej, du har i kommentar till cs changeset/81948389 gjorts uppmärksam om hur kombinerade gång- och cykelvägar bör taggas. Varför ändrar du nu återigen korrekt taggning (way/463129787/history, way/463129412/history, way/108548892/history)?