archie's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 89423327 | over 5 years ago | Revert: this frequently used path (a lot of gps) passes north of, but (just) outside of plot (registerfastighet) Orust Lalleröd 2:63 (address: Lalleröd 694, S-474 96 Nösund). Part of the highway=path immediatly north of the plot is nearer than ca 70 meters and is hereby deleted on osm. Please do respect the swedish Allemansrätt (https://visitsweden.com/what-to-do/nature-outdoors/nature/sustainable-and-rural-tourism/about-the-right-of-public-access/)! You were wrong to delete the entire path. |
| 89255588 | over 5 years ago | Hi, what are your intentions with those edits? |
| 89219148 | over 5 years ago | you destroyed (partly) the multipoligon (relation/5616044). Why? |
| 89122173 | over 5 years ago | Ha, I wrote an answer to your question, which apparently got lost under some short timeout I noticed a short time ago. Mind you tagging a street, which is non-oneway as oneway=no is no fault but unnecessary. I could think of a couple of tags, which could be applied as well: covered=no, area=no, location=outdoor etc. You see my point. Noticing that you are new here at osm - wellcome by the way - I was keen to point out this. Please take your time reading the osm-help (osm.wiki/Sv:Beginners%27_guide). You could read about implicit default values for highways as a starter (osm.wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions). If you have questions don't hesitate to ask myself or som other osm-user with some experience. |
| 89122173 | over 5 years ago | You are not sure, but assume that this is a highway, which is not oneway? |
| 89122173 | over 5 years ago | oneway=no is default. So what's the point in this tagging? |
| 88681514 | over 5 years ago | Mach dich nicht lächerlich! |
| 85863995 | over 5 years ago | Förlåt om jag blandar mig i, men du har helt rätt joihoin, bicycle=yes är i detta fall en tautologi eller tårta på tårta. Bra att du tog bort det. |
| 85683012 | over 5 years ago | Med JOSM har du ju allt du behöver. Det här var inte så märkvärdigt. Du markerar hela skogspolygonen och då ser (eller såg) du att det fanns en snutt way för mycket. |
| 85683012 | over 5 years ago | Jag har nu fixat det. |
| 85683012 | over 5 years ago | Kolla cs way/104764487. I den allra nordligaste delen har det smugit sig in ett geometriskt fel. Kan du korrigera det, tack. |
| 85815466 | over 5 years ago | Hi, landuse=military is usualliy for state-owned military. So what's this "Staten Gunnerörd" (State of Gunneröd) ting? I would like to point out that openstreetmap is a serious project. |
| 85720994 | over 5 years ago | Ok, tack. |
| 85720994 | over 5 years ago | Du har flyttat en adressnod från en byggnad till insidan på en parkeringsplats. Om det skett av misstag v v rätta till detta. I annat fall svara på varför adressnoden skall ligga på parkeringsplatsen. |
| 85712156 | over 5 years ago | Vill du vara vänlig att svara på varför du ändrat taggningen, tack. |
| 52166294 | over 5 years ago | Please note that highway=cycleways are just for bicycles. Please read osm.wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#Default. |
| 85756545 | over 5 years ago | This cs has been reverted as these highways by default are not for foot-passage. Please look at osm.wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#Default. |
| 85720994 | over 5 years ago | Var det av misstag att du flyttade adressnoden (node/671497201)?
|
| 85712156 | over 5 years ago | Är du hygglig och ändrar tillbaka till highway=path, tack! Vill du vara vänlig att läsa detta: highway=path#Usage_as_a_universal_tag, samt, access=designated (på slutet). Tack! |
| 85712156 | over 5 years ago | Hej, du har i kommentar till cs changeset/81948389 gjorts uppmärksam om hur kombinerade gång- och cykelvägar bör taggas. Varför ändrar du nu återigen korrekt taggning (way/463129787/history, way/463129412/history, way/108548892/history)? |