Correct - the sign that has the name with pvt way is there but there was an additional sign saying 'authorized access only'.

Boardman Place seems to have the wrong type of highway tag - it is functionally a footway not a pedestrianized street, where vehicles could be expected.

The presence of a green street sign does not imply the presence of a street - only a public way that is in the city's register. In this case, Boardman Pl does not have an easement as seen in the city assessor's map. https://gis.cambridgema.gov/blockmaps/Block_76.pdf

It does seem like there is a street center line (i.e. registered public way) that surrounds 11-15 Boardman St on three sides - perhaps a footway is better for that case?

The presence of a street sign doesn't mean that it is functionally a road - this should probably be a footway even if is in the list of city public ways (and thus, has a street sign).

Residential type is incorrect here: this provides access only to 1 single building - where residential is generally defined as giving access to a residential area - this is a service road type which is not necessarily a driveway (as it is a private way but on the public list of streets).

Last time I travelled Garden there was a "private - authorized access only" sign at the end of the lane.

There is no cycle track between School Street and Bow Street.

Note The Washington Street 'cycle tracks' are not complete and will not be for a while yet -- Union Square/Webster to Beacon should not have any tags showing cycletracks.

Understandable - I think I changed it last week to reflect that but did you undo that change?

The short section of cycle track on Charlestown Avenue doesn't enter the intersection - it ends just before the Green Line viaduct and turns into a shared-use path.

(Not Eliot Bridge, sorry! -- Galen St bridge in Watertown).

Also, I don't see any documentation that the Paul Dudley White path travells with the Charles River Dam Road. The only documentation I've seen have the PDW as the DCR paths that travel in parallel to the River except at Eliot Bridge.

I see the need - I'm struggling to reconcile this with the general direction on the Names part of the OSM wiki, however. The roadway, sidewalk, and separate bike lanes are all part of the same object even if mapped separately. I believe they are all still linked by relation, which seems appropriate. osm.wiki/Names

cycleway=*#:~:text=A%20cycle%20track,%5B1%5D.

Link to Class IV bikeways defines the the separation as "includ(ing), but is not limited to, grade separation, flexible posts, inflexible posts, inflexible barriers, or on-street parking."

The OSM wiki page indicates that "on-street" bike lanes that are protected, separated, or qualify as Class IV bike lanes can be mapped using separate cycleways. Class IV bike lanes are separated by any kind of physical barrier even if at street level/on street.

I would cut this at Exeter for now - markings flexposts were in between Hereford and Exeter; It's kind of OK Exeter to Clarendon but no flexposts. After Dartmouth though, Eversource workers were cutting into pavement (and MARKINGS! gah) in the bike lane space. It's really not even close to done yet.

They describe the configuration of the roadway much more in line with what's there on the street. There's also more tags that can be added as to surface conditions in the bike lane that would not work if it was "just" tagged.

This should be reverted to the previous version - the 2021 imagery is no longer correct as the intersection of Hampshire and Cambridge Streets was redone to become 2 separate but interoperating intersections.

This should be reverted to the previous version - the 2021 imagery is no longer correct as the intersection of Hampshire and Cambridge Streets was redone to become 2 separate but interoperating intersections.

This should be reverted to the previous version - the 2021 imagery is no longer correct as the intersection of Hampshire and Cambridge Streets was redone to become 2 separate but interoperating intersections.

This should be reverted to the previous version - the 2021 imagery is no longer correct as the intersection of Hampshire and Cambridge Streets was redone to become 2 separate but interoperating intersections.

This should be reverted to the previous version - the 2021 imagery is no longer correct as the intersection of Hampshire and Cambridge Streets was redone to become 2 separate but interoperating intersections.