aharvey's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 105554568 | over 4 years ago | Hi just checking why access tags were removed? For highway=track, it's a good idea to explicitly tag motor_vehicle, bicycle and foot access. |
| 105452223 | over 4 years ago | Oh I see, thanks. so your edit was correct. I re-deleted this one now. Because your changeset comment mentioned crossing water bodies I didn't realise you'd removed this because it was duplicate, sorry. |
| 94745408 | over 4 years ago | I've reverted changeset/105388046 which should have restored these now. |
| 105384291 | over 4 years ago | reverted in changeset/105384291 ways are on different levels so shouldn't share a common node |
| 105385061 | over 4 years ago | I don't see the issue with layer=0 here, it's making it clear someone with knowledge knew this as ground level, or at least level 0 relative to other layer tags. Without it you don't know where you've checked and where you haven't. |
| 105384967 | over 4 years ago | reverted in changeset/105384967 |
| 105384967 | over 4 years ago | how do you know this is really a building passage? It's too hard to tell from the imagery so I'll revert. Please don't just blindly "fix" iD warnings, mostly they need a survey to check what the issue is, is it the road not tagged correctly, the road in the wrong location, the building in the wrong location? |
| 105384852 | over 4 years ago | reverted in changeset/105384852 it's impossible to tell from Maxar if this is a bridge or not |
| 105388046 | over 4 years ago | reverted in changeset/105388046 due to deletion of valid area:highway=* tags |
| 105402298 | over 4 years ago | the original intent here was more likely to have steps, so I've reverted and removed the overlapping path |
| 105452223 | over 4 years ago | not sure why this building was deleted, re-instated in changeset/105452223 |
| 105455224 | over 4 years ago | I reverted this because it doesn't make sense to have a slipway at the end of a pier, and from the imagery the piers are next to the slipway.
|
| 105455519 | over 4 years ago | looks like you've reinstated this, thanks. |
| 105456467 | over 4 years ago | If the path leads to the shelter, then it should connect, so I've reconnected. |
| 105460438 | over 4 years ago | reverted in changeset/105460438 |
| 105460498 | over 4 years ago | reverted in changeset/105460498 |
| 105460554 | over 4 years ago | reverted in changeset/105488443 since this disconnected the lookout and the path, and because the paths probably do go to the waters edge |
| 105461286 | over 4 years ago | reverted in changeset/105461286 |
| 105461911 | over 4 years ago | https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/589839759 probably goes continue to go into the shelter, the warning in iD doesn't mean the path must be moved |
| 105461286 | over 4 years ago | the building deleted here shows up on the DCS imagery, and it's unclear on other imagery. |