No I mean just the public_transport=station tag doesn't make sense here. So no need to delete the whole object, just the public_transport tag.

See railway=station and railway=station. For railway stations which are part of the public transport network you'd use railway=station + public_transport=station + train=yes. For railway stations which aren't part of the public transport network you'd only use railway=station and not the other tags.

So I'd encourage you to please add these back into OSM if they exist on the ground.

Hi there, the public_transport=station tag only applies to train stations part of a public transport network, which these are not. If you remove that tag then this looks good, thanks.

It appears you've also added bicycle=yes to every single node of the highway, which isn't really correct, since unless there is a barrier or something similar on the node, then you just need the tag on the way. Did you do a select all or something in JOSM?

Would you mind cleaning this up?

Could you please give a bit more information about what you're changing and where you're sourcing your information from?

It looks like you've converted the proposed rail line here into dual ways (which is good), but a bit more info would be good. Thanks

Thanks for cleaning up this. That data was originally from someones import, so please be liberal with deleting these if they are not on the ground.

Hey there, could you please note your source? You've added Nelson St bridge, but this bride was removed or in the process of being removed, could you please revert this change?

That's an issue with whatever monitoring software you're using then, you could change it to only alert you when something nearby you changes, not just when the changeset bbox intersects with your area of interest.

Actually I'd prefer it all happen in one large changeset so that any changeset comments can go together, and it can be reviewed just once.

Hi there, welcome to OSM. I noticed you've used Google Maps as a source. Google Maps is copyright and we cannot use their data in OSM. Should I revert your change?

See also osm.wiki/Good_practice in particular if a road changes, it better to just change the tags rather than delete and add again, as the latter looses the object's history.

reverted see osm.wiki/Spam#SEO_Spam

reverted see osm.wiki/Spam#SEO_Spam

reverted see osm.wiki/Spam#SEO_Spam

I've added tourism=hotel back for Park Royal.

I've added tourism=hotel back for Sofitel Sydney

I've added tourism=hotel back for these hotels.

I've added tourism=hotel back for the Grace Hotel.

more tourism=hotel tags deleted here, I've fixed these up

eg. The Langham needs tourism=hotel way/152423825/history

It looks like david jones was already mapped here at node/4661347118, unless there are two within the same building, so I'll delete yours in favour of the pre-existing one. Please reply if that's an issue.

Hey John, I've noticed a few times like with Hilton Sydney, Ibis King Street Wharf, you've removed tourism=hotel when adding building=hotel. The tourism=hotel key must remain for current hotels, building=hotel just means that the building was originally built as a hotel/it is a hotel building.