Didn't take you long to update the bridge! Only closed a few days ago I think.

The Frank Channon Walk looked open today but since it'll be closed soon I think it's okay to leave it as construction.

does NSW RBDM take up the whole building here, or just part of it. If the whole building that's okay, if just part it's probably better to take it as a separate node so the other offices in the same building can be tagged.

building=commercial is appropriate if the building is mostly offices.

You can also use the branch tag branch=* to say which Kennards this is. so branch=Gladesville

It might have been better to keep those nodes as aeroway=parking_position and add new ones for the gate, as before they were actually representing parking_position.

What's your source for the name change?

What's your source for the street addresses?

What's your source for the name change? I originally named it "Cronulla Exchange" likely because that is how it was signposted.

Hey, just letting you know for next time the turn restriction needs to go on a relation with from, via, to members. I've fixed this up for you, the relation is at relation/8893262

There were a few other tags. You can see my changes in https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/64034152/

It looks like you've deleted a whole bunch of attributes here, was that accidental? Could you fix this up please?

The LPI Base Map source you've cited says "Hornby Light Road", not "Lighth". It's possibily an abbreviation for Lighthouse. Not sure how we can verify this as it's private access.

Got it. I've added the highway=residential tag to indicate they are roads. Construction sites can be marked out over the top as an area. The address tags don't make sense on roads, they are usually applied to the street address points along side the road.

Hi, Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing.

Are these new streets in construction or are they open to the public?

Nivison, Pampa, Monmouth aren't connected up to Terry Road based on this change, in reality do they connect?

Do you know if there's a library here anymore? If not you can delete this object all together.

If you had to do some bush bashing, would trail_visibility=bad or horrible be more appropriate? trail%20visibility=*?uselang=en-AU

Thanks for fixing this @jaecord. I would like to know more about the process. Was your AI detecting this as paved, because that's some pretty bad AI. Did this go through a human check?

@magrej it's quite clear from https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58383914/ that the surface tag was added in this changeset, so not by you.

I'd go do a survey and Mapillary capture, but it's a $15 ferry ride... though at low tide it's own a 200m swim, so unless someone beats me too it, when the water warms up in a few months I'll survey it.

I posted a comment at changeset/58383914 as well, but I can't tell from the imagery if this is paved or unpaved, how did you determine it's paved?

I'm not sure that's paved, it can be hard/impossible to tell from the imagery if it's compacted unpaved or gravel or paved. If you're unsure it's probably best to leave it untagged so that it can be picked up by things like StreetComplete to be checked.

As a human I can't tell from the LPI NSW Imagery that https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/393210208 is paved. Can you tell?

In fact it looks unpaved, but we could leave it untagged until it can be surveyed.

You can use the branch tag branch=*

branch=Beecroft
brand=Woolworths
name=Woolworths Beecroft