aharvey's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 173476014 | about 2 months ago | I've updated the tags to be a driveway |
| 173476128 | about 2 months ago | I've updated the tag here to mark it as a driveway. |
| 173477259 | about 2 months ago | I've updated the tags on these to be Shared Driveways |
| 173563166 | about 2 months ago | I think to meet cyclestreet=* it must be a road that is signposted/marked to be explicitly for bicycles as the primary road users with motor vehicles as secondary users. |
| 173568549 | about 2 months ago | the tag nudism=yes already implies this so no need for a note |
| 173656081 | about 2 months ago | to be honest this looks more urban than rural, given the small block size, dense housing and the road network layout... |
| 173695831 | about 2 months ago | thanks for merging the address nodes with your new building outlines correctly. |
| 173740940 | about 2 months ago | hi this is the footpath not a bridge, therefore I've reverted this change. |
| 173817319 | about 2 months ago | way/758025663 is not representing the lot boundary, it's representing the trees, the south east corner looks like grass only so shouldn't be included unless it's been reforested. |
| 173822964 | about 2 months ago | I've restored the address node node/12411966515 which was deleted in this changeset. |
| 170701671 | about 2 months ago | I've restored the address node node/12411966515 which was dragged to the wrong location in this changeset. |
| 173823693 | about 2 months ago | I've restored the address node node/12419092614 which was deleted here |
| 173777581 | about 2 months ago | Yeah I think it's not right to add this to watercourses outside of a golf course. |
| 173828740 | about 2 months ago | I've reverted this change since added layer=-1 to seemingly ground level buildings which seemingly was done to silence editor warnings. |
| 173828992 | about 2 months ago | I've reverted this change since it removed the building type. |
| 173831518 | about 2 months ago | sorry I didn't see your change here, I just reverted the problematic change. |
| 173829084 | about 2 months ago | I've reverted this change since it deleted all the tags per each semi, and regardless it's better to have each semi mapped individually. |
| 173829902 | about 2 months ago | layer=* implies one building is over or under another, but if both are at ground level then it's unlikely adding a layer=* is the correct way to resolve overlapping buildings. |
| 173829113 | about 2 months ago | from the imagery this building does appear to exist so I've reverted this deletion, though it needs a survey to confirm. |
| 173829945 | about 2 months ago | in the processed deleting the building to replace it with individual buildings you've lost some tags like building=retail and building:levels, where possible these should be retained. |