aharvey's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 160974140 | 12 months ago | The name=* tag should only contain the name osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only I've corrected these in my changeset at changeset/160974140 |
| 100866715 | 12 months ago | way/916024901/history is now paved |
| 159521567 | about 1 year ago | I've partially reverted this change in changeset/159521567 to restore the bus stop to a location not glued to the park boundary |
| 160195851 | about 1 year ago | I've changed point 5 back to a service road now as it does provide service vehicle access. |
| 160086385 | about 1 year ago | I've fixed this. |
| 160231990 | about 1 year ago | looks good. |
| 160491282 | about 1 year ago | https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/node/11505453837 entrance=main but noexit=yes? surely that's a bit conflicting? I've added the driveway now for connectivity. |
| 152747580 | about 1 year ago | hi you've duplicated the ferry terminal, https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/node/11984957950 was added on top of the existing one at https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/node/3947706201 It looks like the node you added was also part of the pier way, so it snapped the the ferry terminal node to the pier way, which is good, not sure why the node was duplicate though? Either way I've cleaned this up by deleting your new one in favour of the existing one and re-snapping the ferry terminal node to the pier way. |
| 139786935 | about 1 year ago | What are all the name tag values for these buildings? It should only be used if the buildings have a proper name. |
| 137897455 | about 1 year ago | I fixed what I could find in changeset/160326846 |
| 137897455 | about 1 year ago | I just noticed that a bunch of these added were already existing, and now we have duplicates. |
| 160234969 | about 1 year ago | discussion moved to https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/vicmap-address-import-progress/122863/4 |
| 160195851 | about 1 year ago | 5. https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/1244811645 I had tagged as a service way. It's quite wide with a gate, and the connection with the driveway to me it's designed for emergency/service/maintenance vehicles to access. Therefore I think it's still best tagged as highway=service + motor_vehicle=private + foot=yes. |
| 160195851 | about 1 year ago | I've made further changes to address 2, 3, and 4. But apart from that, good work on the other improvements. |
| 160195851 | about 1 year ago | hi, welcome back to OSM. Some good changes here, but I also have a few comments: 1. The Northern Beaches Council Aerial Imagery is copyright, "The contents of this website are copyright and may not be reproduced in any form without the prior consent of Northern Beaches Council." as such the imagery cannot be used at all, as a reference to map from, or to trace features from. What in particular did you derive from the council images, as we'll want to remove/redo with imagery sources we can use.
|
| 160234969 | about 1 year ago | I found node/12419076028 as one feature imported with addr:flats10. Could we move this discussion to the community forum or a GitLab issue at https://gitlab.com/alantgeo/vicmap2osm/-/blob/master/README.md or the import page talk, osm.wiki/Talk:Import/Catalogue/Vicmap_Address |
| 160234969 | about 1 year ago | I raised this question at osm.wiki/Talk:Key:addr:flats#Exceeding_255_characters previously. Is there anything you can point me to that indicates the :2 :3 etc. key suffix is in use already for overflowing tag values? On another note, thinking about this more, perhaps there is a different syntax we can come up with that represents these long addr:flats values in less characters? |
| 160185742 | about 1 year ago | I missed your comment Graeme. I just updated them to match the months listed on the website, exact dates would be better if you know that flaming heart? |
| 157692595 | about 1 year ago | Looks good @Tewuzij I disagree @mcliquid, for a change like this, its better to keep it together as all the changes are related, as it makes it easier to review, comment on, etc. |
| 158913371 | about 1 year ago | please take care to not remove the branch information from the name eg. https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/444590133 In my view it should be
|