Hi, I see you've added this as a mountain bike route, is there signage indicating it's either open or closed to mountain bikes or bicycles?

We've had a report from Horbart City Council that this is a walking track only, so trying to understand what is there on the ground.

-- on behalf of the Data Working Group,
Andrew

hi I removed name=Lookout because osm.wiki/Good_practice#Don.27t_use_name_tag_to_describe_things

The bottom no bicycles sign is no longer there, only the top two, I have Mapillary captured, but won't get a chance to upload it for maybe a week.

Agree with @inas here.

see also comment at changeset/92223392 about this

Agreed with ortho_is_hot here, the railway is underground so shouldn't have any shared nodes with the road nor be a crossing or level_crossing.

Did you see this was a disused railway here and also disused level crossing already tagged https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/node/1597385992 so I believe how it was previously by the local mapper was right.

looks good. There is a clear "Private Road" sign showing for Sea Street so all good. https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=-33.83224722222223&lng=151.150425&z=17&focus=photo&pKey=kX6AM3TbnIBbucyHzmHizA&x=0.4532493606392&y=0.5196650251542435&zoom=0.8103975535168195

If signposted it's still okay to map the relation, because you're mapping the signage.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91797243

The tag for driveways is highway=service + service=driveway, I've fixed this.

also highway=service + service=driveway is the tag to use for these driveways I've fixed that up in changeset/91570614 see service=driveway

I've unglued the power line which you glued to the road changeset/91570584

Usually there are no pedestrian signs where you can't walk, so assuming those are present here, then all good.

hi I updated the name and ref for way/45728168 based on sinage

hi what's your source for the speed limit and name? this road was already mapped with a different name. Since this added a duplicate road segment on top I'll revert in the meantime.

hi what's your source for the speed limit and classification? This road was already mapped, the one you added was a duplicate on top so I'll revert this for now until you can confirm.

hi, generally if you're adding many buildings if you could do a few before uploading instead of saving each building as a changeset.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91396007

Hi welcome to OpenStreetMap. It looks like you've traced out a few driveways as areas and tagged them as buildings. Things should only be tagged building where they are a structure with walls and a roof, which is not a driveway, you can map driveways as a linear way (line) and tag it as a driveway instead.
Also for buildings it should be the footprint of the building not the whole land parcel, so the backyard shouldn't be included.

Great work. I saw this one recently but wasn't on my bike so didn't manage to grab a trace. There looked like cycleway on the eastern side too.

Probably the hosted routing engines didn't update. When I tested now with the GraphHopper hosted router on osm.org it avoids routing through Walumetta Drive, but will route through it if the end point is along it (which is how it should work for destination).
OSRM hosted by FOSSGIS might not have updated, or it might not handle destination correctly.