I've reinstated the name tag in changeset/82767616

I've reinstated the name tag in changeset/82767616

reverted as seo spam osm.wiki/Spam#SEO_Spam

reverted as seo spam osm.wiki/Spam#SEO_Spam

FYI none of the tolled motorways in Sydney have toll_boths, we only have highway=toll_gantry

Part from that I can't see any evidence of a tolling point here https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=3xy7fpSoBqWDFVz1SnTHvQ&focus=photo, has one since been installed?

hi! highway=construction is used where the track is under construction or undergoing major repair work, is that the case or is it just closed for access due to landslide risk?

Hi I see you removed https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/585994923 and added dual carriage ways.

1. Where possible if you could try to reuse existing ways that's helpful to retain the history. So you could convert that existing way to one of the carriage ways and then create a new one. I know this isn't always easy so it's not a rule, just nice to do if possible.
2. Ways generally are only mapped as each direction if there is a physical barrier separating them. In this case from the imagery and at https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/SGbQF7N5A9y6aVj9HOVIqA I can't see any barrier, if you surveyed recently did you notice any new separation? If not then it should usually be mapped as a single way.

I think in these cases where there is no other known road name and "Sydney Harbour Tunnel" is considered as the road name, it should remain in the name= tag.

What's the meaning of relation/10868380, is there every a case where you can uturn into the same road without a roundabout or turning circle?

Yes see https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/03/17/use-of-cc-by-data/ CC BY was reviewed by the OSMF Licensing Working Group and they decided we still need a waiver and at the moment we only have permission for NSW LPI Web Services data.

Which LIDAR data? We only have a waiver for the NSW LPI Web Services, not all open data such as those through ELVIS.

any reason to remove building=industrial?

highway=service is appropriate, there's no gutter so just a basic road, it's only there to service two houses and more like a service road. Further this service road has a lowered gutter for access to Barwon road so it's still very much a lower classification road.

Hi I checked this on the ground and the name is indeed signposted so I reinstated it.

I've changed these to leisure=park in changeset/82139260

Form the imagery Wiggins Reserve and Austin Reserve just look like leisure=park leisure=park and not leisure=nature_reserve leisure=nature%20reserve. Because they are public parks kids go to to play, they aren't there to preserve wildlife or flora from the looks of it.

reverted due to flagged as seo spam

the original name I added here 9 years ago sourced from an historical parish map, I just rechecked the parish map and it's what GNB have too so must have been a typo originally.

Generally if they are the same picnic grounds you'd just have one OSM element, ideally an area covering both. If they are distinct enough to be considered different you could have two, but in this case I'm not sure. If you've been there on the ground and you reckon it's just one you can delete one and extend the area to cover both.

Depends which map you're looking at :-P They show up on my OSM based bushwalking map https://www.beyondtracks.com/map/#16.25/-33.708933/150.289163
The default OSM map style doesn't render them yet discussion about that is at https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/788