aharvey's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 62393198 | over 6 years ago | It was named that when I mapped it, but likely they abandoned it now. |
| 74567370 | over 6 years ago | reverted, seo spam |
| 74462393 | over 6 years ago | I've added the club=sport tag to this. |
| 73822580 | over 6 years ago | documenting this changeset was reverted in changeset/73962085 |
| 73822580 | over 6 years ago | @ecoeng Changeset comments are to provide context or a description of what the change is and why it's being made, not to make personal attacks against other contributors. I invite you to join in the discussion at https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/2019-September/012863.html |
| 70970648 | over 6 years ago | @ecoeng Please see the discussion over at https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/2019-September/012863.html |
| 74288191 | over 6 years ago | I believe it's common practice not to name link roads (Denham Street), this is also noted at highway=tertiary_link, because in this case the link road is not really part of either road. |
| 68161831 | over 6 years ago | https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/68161831/ in this changeset you've dropped the cycleway and surface attributes, I've fixed this up now, but try to watch out for this next time. |
| 74200346 | over 6 years ago | looks good now, thanks. |
| 74151053 | over 6 years ago | I didn't hear back yet, so I've gone ahead and restored these |
| 74200346 | over 6 years ago | Re https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/520768412 is this way no longer a parking aisle? To me it looks like a parking aisle as it runs through the carpark and feeds into spaces, https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/6-HMaOeNnuch3jphlbmmNw |
| 74200346 | over 6 years ago | Regarding https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/639590232 building=service is correct for buildings which house transformers per building=*#Power.2FTechnical_buildings |
| 74200346 | over 6 years ago | The bollard needs to be on the way so that routers know that this bollard affects the way. While I sympathise that you want to map each bollard individually, could you just use a count tag or something instead? |
| 74218277 | over 6 years ago | PS. I'm commenting because you requested a review to your changeset. |
| 74218277 | over 6 years ago | looks good, if you want you could add the phone number in the international format +61 2 xxxx xxxx, which is more correct. If it's only japanese food I'd leave off the asian cuisine, I'd only use that for a restaurant that either I can't tell which specific type of asian cuisine it is, or it serves a variety of asian cuisine. |
| 48838689 | over 6 years ago | I removed this as a duplicate of node/4242642657. |
| 74151053 | over 6 years ago | It looks like you've changed building=retail to building=yes, if these are shop buildings, then building=retail would be better. Did you want to change it back? |
| 73993556 | over 6 years ago | It's okay to map private driveways in OSM, you can use the access=private tag to indicate private access, I've done this in changeset/73993556. |
| 73984430 | over 6 years ago | @WoodWoseWulf There is way/544057064 many different kinds of grasses side by side there. |
| 73984430 | over 6 years ago | In this context leisure=garden is not talking specifically about the flower bed landuse, it's saying this venue, the Royal Botanic Gardens, is a planned space set aside for cultivation, and enjoyment of plants and other forms of nature. Those cafes are all part of the gardens venue, since this is not a landuse or landcover tag I think it's fine. The "woods" inside are all part of the gardens. You can think of this as a more specific type of park. Lastly I know the name itself doesn't imply the tags we should use, but it is called Royal Botanic Garden not Royal Botanic Park. |