aharvey's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 30563007 | over 7 years ago | node/3482883979 same question about isced level 0 |
| 30491804 | over 7 years ago | ditto way/251561861 |
| 30491804 | over 7 years ago | node/3477989701 same question about isced level 0 |
| 30843147 | over 7 years ago | node/343601250 same question about isced level 0 |
| 31227736 | over 7 years ago | same question about node/3523591264 |
| 31228303 | over 7 years ago | way/345716013/history isced level 0-1? 0 is preschool, but grades according to the nsw schools data say its only K-6. |
| 30300720 | over 7 years ago | node/3462833321 isced:level of 0 means preschool, the nsw schools database says it's K-6 does this cater for pre kinder kids? |
| 44072954 | over 7 years ago | Primary schools are usually operated by the Department of Education, normally only preschools are operated by the local council, so this school is really operated by the local council? |
| 31388676 | over 7 years ago | way/254796555/history isced:level 0 is preschool, the NSW Public Schools database says this is only K-6 which is isced:level 1. Do you have local knowledge of this? |
| 31944593 | over 7 years ago | node/3592233612/history you've set the isced:level as 0-1. In Australia 0 is preschool, before primary school. Are you sure this school includes preschool, under Kindergarten? The NSW Public Schools database says it only starts at Kindergarten. |
| 21296007 | over 7 years ago | Based on the LPI Suburb boundaries, Strahfield South High School appears to be in the suburb "Strathfield", you entered this school as being in "Strathfield South", are you sure about that? |
| 58335428 | over 7 years ago | Yeah this change looks correct according to the GNB record, but the GNB isn't always reflecting what's currently on the ground. https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=-33.79807777777779&lng=151.28864722222215&z=17&pKey=GeypGcKiQQhVzeTiybhU2A&focus=photo&x=0.2722288291602708&y=0.4698092965946888&zoom=0.8087487283825024 says South Steyne but it's unclear what it's referring too... |
| 58251817 | over 7 years ago | This looks like a good start, I think it's okay for the building outlines to be rough initially, anyone is free to improve if they like. Just as @nevw said why were a bunch of buildings deleted? It's okay to delete them if they were demolished, but that's about the only case they should be removed. If they are not "important" it's still okay to be in OSM if they are standing. |
| 58251817 | over 7 years ago | PS. Your edits go live immediately, there is no approval process. |
| 58335428 | over 7 years ago | Are you absolutely sure about this? Wikipedia says "From north to south, the three main sections are Queenscliff, North Steyne, and South Steyne" which could imply the whole thing is Manly Beach, with that bottom section being South Steyne Beach. |
| 58358891 | over 7 years ago | I have no issue with aggressively removing future edits which look like this, as it appears they are using a Geocoder to get the location, which we likely can't include the derived information from. Someone who has local knowledge would never put it in the wrong suburb! |
| 49044200 | over 7 years ago | sport=cricket_nets has over 1000 usages https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/sport=cricket_nets. Even though there is some debate about it's use, I think it's better to use that tag, and drop the descriptive name tag. |
| 58431694 | over 7 years ago | +1 indierokkr, only taking the sporting fields as leisure=pitch inside a leisure=park makes sense here. |
| 58303772 | over 7 years ago | Nice work here. A question, what is way/399566412 is it a hall, classrooms, administrative section? I'm not sure amenity=townhall is the best tag here. just building=school would probably suffice. |
| 24991516 | over 7 years ago | you've added this picnic site over a residential area, could you move it to the right location based on the LPI Imagery which should be clearer here? |