OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
116197264 about 3 years ago

And way/231150942 was correct with asphalt.

116197264 about 3 years ago

way/231150926 unhewn_cobblestone? It is normal concrete. A typo or what did you mean?

105395840 about 3 years ago

There is no sidewalk on the south of Furdekova here, why are you saying it is sidewalk=both?

105248971 about 3 years ago

The parking before the courthouse way/399074565 is not signed in any way, but you again just guessed it is for "customers" only. It may be logical, but there is no sign saying that.

105248971 about 3 years ago

The same at way/399074567, the road is marked for access only with permission of the hospital, thus private. If you can't read the Slovak road signs, do not guess the access values.

105248971 about 3 years ago

Hi, why access=yes on node/3526660641 when it is already marked vehicle=private? It is only for employees of the court.

127681108 about 3 years ago

Hi, how is this Pskov region?
How do you see entrances and building levels in Maxar Premium imagery? Also why so many useless nodes on the sides of the buildings? Also it is totally suspicious that all those buildings are the same size, which does not really fit the imagery you claim to use. There are also better imageries available in this region. So this whole changeset seems absolutely invalid and will be reverted.

112933056 about 3 years ago

Vacsina tych chodnikov, co ste popridavali, nie su postranne chodniky pri ceste, takze footway=sidewalk je nespravne.

118850309 about 3 years ago

Cakame na odpoved.

A preco su tie mury s area=yes? To chcete povedat, ze ten mur je vlasne betonova doska (vysky mozno ako jedno poschodie) pod celou budovou? V tom pripade je to budova, tak ako to zaznacene bolo len ste to znicili. Dodnes ste na to neodpovedali v changeset/112834947.

112932389 about 3 years ago

Zdravim, building:part=apartments bolo spravne. Kazdy ten blok je podla katastra jedna velka budova s dvoma vezami a nizkym stredom. Preco to nicite? Teraz ste vytvorili vzdy po dve budovy s rovnakym supisnym cislom.

128063880 about 3 years ago

Zdravim, predpokladam, ze priestor predajne tam zostal, v takom pripade namiesto uplneho vymazania bodu zmenime znacku na shop=vacant (cize prazdny obchodny priestor). Zachova sa tym historia bodu a zabrani pripadnemu obnoveniu obchodu inym maperom zo starsich fotiek ci inych materialov.

120632526 about 3 years ago

Ale vy nemozete doplnat povolene pre cyklistov len preto, ze tam nejaka mapa maluje nejaku cyklotrasu. Musite doplnat udaje podla reality. Su aj miesta, kde cyklotrasa ide po usekoch, kde je jazda bicyklom vyslovene zakazana. Zrejme tam sa da pokracovat zosadnutim z bicykla. Ale teda na tych miestach ziadne "bicycle=yes" nepatri (indikovalo by to, ze su tam bicykle povolene a mozu jazdit normalnou rychlostou).

Na tomto mieste je cyklotrasa len planovana (ma to aj v nazve), podla znacky state=proposed (cize len navrhovana).

Rychlo teda tieto nespravne zmeny po Slovensku vratte do povodneho stavu. Dakujem

73890592 about 3 years ago

No tie adresy 3A/B a 1A/B ste neopravili tak som to uz pozrel ja a opravil. Z nejakeho dovodu su namiesto 1A/B cisla 2A/B.

55685229 about 3 years ago

Zdravim, co je to "Pristavok" ? Ak je to typ budovy, nepatri to do nazvu.

127981472 about 3 years ago

Z tej dopravnej znacky Cesta pre motorove vozidla vyplyvaju zo zakona nejake obmedzenia tak je potrebne to oznacit. Myslim, ze osadenim tej znacky spravca cesty rozhodol, ze je to "high performance or high importance road" a predpokladam, ze musi splnat nejake parametre kedze napr. "musi byt mozne ist na rovine minimalne 60km/h", takze lubovolnu pochybnu cestu tym asi oznacit nejde.

Ano momentalne CPMV znacime highway=trunk+motorroad=yes (pre vyjadrenie obmedzeneho pristupu pre inych ucastnikov). Je to tak aj na highway=trunk , aj ked mozno este z minulosti (kedze vyznam znacky sa v zakone parkrat menil). Ak mate iny navrh skusme to prebrat na fore, kedze takych ciest je viac.

125572285 about 3 years ago

Definitely not, see changeset/118524185 . Don't use outdated imagery and check against multiple sources. Maxar shows the junction is reworked, also the comments in changesets say so. You are obliged to check the history of the objects you touch.

127593620 about 3 years ago

Great, thanks!

126952380 about 3 years ago

Hi, please tell us how you found out the various translated names of Bratislava by survey or aerial imagery.

121489386 about 3 years ago

Hi, why the movement?
Please do not touch positions if you do not know why the node was placed here.

127366359 over 3 years ago

Dakujem, ale zabudli ste zmenit proposed=tram na construction=tram, aby bolo jasne, co sa stavia.