There is really no reason to assume a connector road would be oneway too.

Also, the part of Legerskeho
way/826473239 is actually bothways (I have fixed it now), so you are doing changes without properly looking at imagery and without knowing the state on the ground.

Please stop with such baseless changes immediately. Both changes in Slovakia you did were totally wrong, you couldn't even read the Maxar imagery properly. So I wonder how correct your other changes are.

Tipujem, ze kedysi to bola neobyvana oblast. Ale to uz je otazka na povodneho autora bodu, nie tu.

Zdravim, co ma byt ta office=educational_institution? Aka firma sa tam nachadza? Skolka sa znaci inak a tu ste aj zaznacili (aj ked na nespravny objekt, ma to byt na areali).

Hi, why is way/380117915 highway=pedestrian? What is the traffic sign there?

Also why did you need to duplicate the object at way/286384631 ? Also the big grass polygon you made at way/990963635 is needlessly covering the Botanicka street, where are many non-grass areas.

Otherwise thanks for the added small buildings in the gardens.

Zvyknem to nechavat, ked ide nadalej o restauraciu ci kaviaren, len sa zmeni nazov. Moze byt, ze ludia este poznaju povodny nazov, tak to moze byt pomocka.

Ak je ta znacka v poriadku, nemazte to. Ak to podla Vas nema hodnotu, neznamena, ze nema ani pre ostatnych.

Vy si naozaj nedate povedat, zase pochybne premenovanie mosta Lanfranconi:
way/282404783

Keby ste si pozreli historiu objektu, zistili by ste, ze bol nedavno zamerne premenovany:
changeset/110336928

Este aj na wikistranke, na ktoru odkazuje wikidata na objekte, a z ktorej nelegalne kradnete udaje, je historia nazvu uvedena.
Ano v diskusii pisu, ze nazov je troch sporny (https://sk.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diskusia:Most_Lanfranconi), ale Vy to nevyriesite, tak skuste neprepisovat lokalnych maperov.
(inak ak v ceskej verzii je to s 'n', https://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Most_Lanfranconi )

A ked uz prepisujete, zase nekompletne, napr. na relation/3748559 ste to nezmenili.

Da sa pouzit aj reverter, ale takto pre jeden objekt je jednoduchsie to "Obnovit objekt". Polozku pridava tento plugin do JOSM: osm.wiki/JOSM/Plugins/Undelete . Aktivujete si ho v nastaveniach JOSM -> pluginy .

Obnovil som pomocou toho povodny bod: node/2688836802/history

Zdravim, prosim nedavajte na kazdy chodnik footway=sidewalk. To znamena len chodnik popri ceste, nie krizom cez park ci vnutroblok. Dakujem.

Na wiki obnovenie objektu nie je, je to vec konkretneho editoru. Kedze pouzivate JOSM, tak je to v menu Soubor -> Obnovit objekt.

Pri Vapenke neviem preco spominate inu cestu, ked som pisal way/1003913185 . Mate pravdu, cesta tam bola uz davno pred Vami (napr. https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=22011870), ale v tej dobe tam este zrejme ta budova nebola (ako pisem, vyzera novo). Ale pred 4 mesiacmi ked ste ju menili, bola rovnaka Ortofotomozaika ako dnes (je z roku 2020) a teda predpokladam tam ta budova uz bola vidiet, cize nemalo velky zmysel cestu delit a ponechavat.

Kedze je stary preto je v old_name. Co je na tom zle? Nie je to na co ta znacka sluzi?

Again, both older imagery and your Maxar imagery show this road is both ways (there is even a merge to right lane continuing from this onto Racianska street.

So what is your point? Why did you single out these 2 roads in Slovakia and got the urge to mistag them?

Hi, why do you introduce wrong data? If you bothered to check the history of the road, you would see I changed it no oneway=no based on survey. Also you claim you used Maxar imagery, where it is seen the road got added the opposite lane (compared to older imagery) to allow both ways traffic. So what are you trying to do?

Are your other mass changes of similar "quality" ?

Inak tu krizovatku v novsom stave je uz vidiet na snimkach Maxar. Tam uvidite, ze moj stav je spravny. Teraz som to vratil do povodneho stavu.

Ale ten bod 2688836802 ste neobnovili, ale ste vytvorili novy. Tak sa to nerobi, teraz sa tvarite ako autor tych udajov.

A neodpovedali ste na tu cestu pri Vapenke.

But there was no need to change "maxspeed:type" to "source:maxspeed", it was the correct tag. Yes, the wiki says source:maxspeed is mostly used in the world, but maxspeed:type is semantically the better tag so why should it be limited to UK?

Thanks for the fixes. Someone always breaks the Flixbus relations somewhere in Europe. Sometimes the iD editor itself does invalid reordering of members.

In the country of Slovakia, please use Ortofotomozaika SR imagery (which is the best), not Bing.
Thanks.

Vymazane na zaklade coho? Podla snimok Bingu asi nie...

Uprava pozicii o meter? A ani ziadny nazov ste nezmenili. Aky je prinos tejto sady zmien?

Zdravim, preco vymaz stareho nazvu?

Ano to je dobry pristup. Treba si pozerat aj historiu objektov, aby ste videli kedy sa to naposledy menilo. A tie cesty prave prislupne su (ziadne access=no), aby sa auta dostali k tomu predajnemu miestu Nesto.