Zdravim, ked menite objekt podla nejakeho ineho zdroja ako je na nom uvedeny (tu source=kapor2 na Vila Bethlen), upravte znacku na novy zdroj.
Dakujem

Also adding addr:street here is incorrect, as the hamlet does not have named streets. Addr:place was enough.

Hi, why are you changing the address of this house? addr:city=Vysoke Tatry was definitelly correct. Also the housenumber of 13003 was from the cadastre office. Does the house owner still display an outdated number of '3' on the house?
But it seems the fix of the name and adding that it is a tourist apartment seems correct, thanks.

No ja neviem, ale "Tatrapoma S" asi nebude nazov tohto vleku, skor vyrobny model.

Zdravim, odkial pochadzaju tie pridane nazvy_ OpenTopoMap to urcite nie je.

A prosim piste zmysluplnejsie popisy sad zmien, pozrite osm.wiki/Cs:Dobr%C3%A9_koment%C3%A1%C5%99e_sad_zm%C4%9Bn . Popis "nové dáta" nema ziadnu hodnotu.

Zdravim, ako ste z Ortofotomozaiky vycitali zmenu cisla trate 185 na 112A ?
Prosi uvadzajte Vase skutocne zdroje.

Zdravim, co na bode node/306468680 znamena aerialway=yes? Hodnota 'station' bola spravna. A na lanovky sa nepouziva public_transport=station.

Super, dik.

Chcel som povedat, ked ma access aj vehicle ci motorcar rovnaku hodnotu (ako tu 'permissive", tak su zbytocne. Ked maju roznu tak OK.
Napr. na way/258898464 je len motorcar nadbytocne. Vyzera OK, ze vozidla maju zakaz (len pre vlastnikov), ale pride mi cudne, ze vsetci ostatni (napr. chodci) tam maju len "permissive", cize su tolerovani, kym to vlastnik neodvola. To mi takto v meste pride zvlastne. Je tam nejaka moznost, ze obmedzi chodcov? Je tam brana, ktoru moze lahko zamknut?

Zdravim, Evanjelicky kostol tam uz bol ako plocha, napriek tomu ste ho znovu pridali ako bod node/5495804791 . Okrem toho ste ho (a aj pozemok) oznacili ako denomination=evanjelical, pritom uz povody kostol bol oznaceny spravne s denomination=lutheran. Davajte na to pozor, co sa na Slovensku vola "evanjelicke" (cirkev ECAV), sa v OSM znaci denomination=lutheran, lebo "evanjelical" je "evanjelikalne" a je to nieco ine. Taktiez prosim trosku oficialnejsie nazvy ako "Evanielická fara" (este aj s preklepom). Prosim pozor na taketo detaily.

Zdravim, prosim davajte pozor na tu hodnotu 'permissive', znamena to, ze vsetci maju vstup povoleny kym si to vlastnik nerozmysli. Ak pisete, ze je tam "obmedzeny vstup" (zrejme len vlastnik ci obmedzeny okruh ludi/vozidiel), ma to byt hodnota 'private'. A ked ste uz zadali access=*, potom su znacky motorcar a vehicle nadbytocne. Ak je tam brana do dvora, potom je access OK, vstup maju zakazany aj chodci, ale ak tam nie je, potom tam teoreticky mozu ist, ak tam nie je nejaka znacka ci napis "sukromny pozemok". Vtedy davajte obmedzenie len podla znacky, napr. casto je tam len zakaz vjazdu, teda vehicle=private. Skuste to v Ruzomberku poopravovat. Dakujem

Hm, tak pylony ste ponechali, ale lanovku (ktora v lete vytahuje boby a v zime lyziarov) ste zmenili na leisure=track a sport=toboggan. To vyzera ako dost nezmysel (nejazdi sa tam, ale je tam lanovka) a toboggan vyzera byt podla definicie sportova bobova draha (asi viac profesionalna). Draha detskej bobovej drahy je uz zakreslena vedla (way/353547452). Davajte pozor.

Zdravim, standardne na Slovensku bicykle na polnu/lesnu cestu nesmu. Pokial sa nedokaze opak, je tam zakaz spravne, aj ked ho normalne vyslovne netagujeme, vyplyva z highway=track.

Hi, you can't just place a node and name it that something is 'ahead', thus not at the position you placed it at. That's invalid in OSM. If there is a traffic sign or an information board, then tag it as such using the proper tags. But the minefield surely isn't at that place in the city.

Hi, I said the names are invalid and shouldn't be there. hazard=minefield is enough.
Also, what source is 'DGU ortofoto'? On which ortofoto imagery can you see mines hidden in the ground? Please provide your real source, thanks.

Hi, thanks for marking the danger zones.
But you can't put any random note into the 'name' tag of an object. In OSM only proper official names do belong there, e.g. if the military called the zone like "Minefield Gornje Gamocko polje". You already tagged it military=danger_area which conveys it is dangerous to go there. That the danger specifically are mines can be expressed using hazard=minefield tag, see osm.wiki/Proposed_features/hazard .
Only inexpressible property is that the minefield is only 'suspected'. That can be preserved in the 'description' or 'note' tag. Or even 'fixme' so that the object needs rechecking if the mines are there or not.

Also, did http://www.euforbih.org give permission to use the minefield maps for OSM?

Zdravim, preco na letisku Partizanske to "LZPT" do vsetkych moznych znaciek? Myslim, ze by to malo byt to byt len v 'icao'.

Hi, you can't put random remarks into the 'name' tag of an object, . Only official proper names of the object belong there. You already expressed that it is a dangerous area using military=danger_area. I don't know if that marking is correct, whether the zone still belongs to the military.
Also it would be better to draw the mines zone as an area, not simple points.

Anyway, landmines danger can be expressed using hazard=minefield, see osm.wiki/Proposed_features/hazard , which I will now add. Thanks for marking the land mine zones.

V pohode, ja len pre istotu :) Napr. v Bratislave v centre su obchody len v casti budovy. Ak je to tu inak, nebudem sa hadat, nebol som tam.
Opravil som plno inych chyb a este ich tam dost zostalo.

Hi, why do you change the names of regions in Slovakia to wrong names? What is your source? You only mention Maxar imagery, where you can't see any names.

Also write more useful changeset comments than "aktualizacja", see osm.wiki/Pl:Komentarze_zestawu_zmian .

You are at 5000 changesets already, I would assume you know some OSM rules.