Zdravim, cesty cez umyvacku aut su vacsinou indoor=yes (cize ste vo vnutri budovy a dostanete sa k jej vnutornemu vybaveniu. Nie je to tunnel=building_passage (co je cesta cez budovu, kde vidite len steny a nic z vnutra budovy). Nerobte teda tieto zmeny.

Ostatne vyzera celkom dobre, aj ked zase bez uvedenia zdroja, takze velmi pochybne.

I don't think the whole roundabout needs to be the 'via' member of the no-turn-right restriction. Just the common node of the 2 ways, as it was before.

Ok, thank you for the explanation. I see the description on the wiki. But notice that it is marked 'dubious', thus I think no mass edits should be made based on it. Also, notice the reasoning for it is that routers should pass at least a small segment of the roundabout so that they even notice it (and can speak it out ("enter roundabout")). But I assume that is for cases where you can enter with one of the branching roads and then exit immediatelly with the next. But that is not the case here, you cannot exit the roundabout via the Napervillska street (there was a turn restriction relation present). You must go via the rounandabout and exit at the Chrenovska street at the soonest. Thus, the router will pass over a segment of the roundabout in all cases, whether you add the small segment you created or not.

So either you revert this changeset as it is not needed to solve anything, or fix all the bus lines, but that will be very tedious and costly for no benefit. Just don't have an invalid middle-ground with broken bus relations.
Thank you.

And of course, you have now damaged all bus route relations passing this roundabout, as you didn't remove needed segments out of the relations (what needs to be done now when you split the roundabout into parts).

Hi, what was wrong here?
Aside from damaging the geometry of the incoming road way/287370446 .
Why did the way/1442069772 need to be added?
Show me the exact error maproulette was claiming.

Zdravim, cyklocesta ako way/1263243624 nie je na hradzi? Preco ste to po celej dlzke odstranili?
Cyklocesta od rieky ku hradu uz bola zakreslena, pridanie paralelnej cesty ako way/1425252689 je zbytocna duplikacia.
Cesta way/112573857 je uz naozaj vyhradena len pre cyklistov, nesmu tam ziadne auta?

Zdravim, aky chodnik tu chybal? Napr. popri Kmetovej od krizovatky s Vinicky na sever ziadny chodnik nie je (aspon v 2/2025), je tam len cyklocesta. Odvtedy nejaky pristavali?

Taktiez ta cyklocesta popri Dubikovej je velmi divna. Je fyzicky oddelena od ulice? Nie je to vidiet na ziadnych fotkach, mate nejake fotky, ze by sme to podla nich opravili?

Taktiez uplne nespravne kreslite priechody pre chodcov. Informacie davate na koncove body priechodu, pritom by mali byt na spolocnom bode cesty a chodnika (priechodu). Cize napr. na node/13018562528 , nie vyrabat body ako node/13100112135.

Taktiez napr. na priechode node/13100112135 este v 6/2025 nebola ziadna zebra. Uz tam je?

Zdravim, na mnohych miestach je tento cyklochodnik zdielany s schodcami, takze nebolo potrebne pridavat novu ciaru (kedze nie je fyzicky oddeleny od chodnika pre pesich). Stacilo zmenit vlastnosti povodneho chodnika. Opravil som.

Zdravim, po tej cyklotrase mozu chodit aj chodci a tuto informaciu ste stratili ked ste len zmenili footway na cycleway. Opravil som.

Zdravim. Ked mate vodu v tuneli pod zemou s layer=-1, nie su cesty nad nou mostami. A naozaj tam ta Jelsina tecie pod zemou? A ako moze mat dalsi pritok z pola s rovnakym nazvom?

Dakujem, chapem co ste tu chceli dosiahnut, ale len dokreslenim jednej cesty to nevyriesite.

Bolo treba este spravne znizit spravne pocet jazdnych pruhov na ceste 513, z ktorej ste oddelili novy odbocovaci pruh (nestaci len zmenit na lanes=2, ale treba aj ostatne znacky *lanes*), prelozit linky MHD na novu cestu...
Opravil som.

Dakujem, celkom dobre, len usek way/1436755528 nema mat 3 jazdne pruhy ale len 2, kedze odbocovaci pruh este nema plnu sirku.

Zdravim, preco je ten chodnik na moste tvoreny 5 usekmi, ked maju vsetky rovnake vlastnosti? Stacil by jeden.

Zdravim, preco body motorway_junction na niecom, co nie je dialnica?

Neviem preco musia byt vsetky tie cesty 'service'. Tie najvacsie pomenovane tahy mohli zostat 'unclassified' ak uz teda nie 'residential'. A hlavne zabudli zmenit vela kratkych usekov.

Zdravim, na tejto zastavke stoji nejaky autobus MHD?
Uvadzajte prosim zdroj udajov, kedze tu ako jediny ste uviedli Ortofoto a tam nazov zastavky nevidite.

A tiez prosim zmysluplnejsie popisy sad zmien ako len "uprava". Pozrite osm.wiki/Cs:Dobr%C3%A9_koment%C3%A1%C5%99e_sad_zm%C4%9Bn .

Tu este chyba znacka religion, prosim doplnte ak viete.

Znovu, aj socha aj schranka? Chapem, ze mozno socha svateho v schranke, ale v takejto kombinacii som to este nevidel. Hlavne ked to place_of_worship=shrine nema definovany vyznam. Vy ste vymysleli to znacku? Tak ju zdokumentujte.

A to chodite po celej Dunajskej Luznej a hladate tie schranky? Lebo mnohe ste pridali ako prvy, dakujeme.

node/13147966599 to je zaroven aj pamatnik/socha a zaroven aj nabozenska schranka? Ako to?

Ani place_of_worship=shrine nema ziadny popis.
Taktiez sa mi javi, ze na tieto historic=wayside_* sa ani amenity=place_of_worhip nema davat, pozrite amenity=place_of_worship#How_to_map .