Hi, the fords you have added are not seen on Ortofotomozaika SR. How do you know they are there?

node/4803612670 . Branch=sk ? To vyzera velmi divne.

Dakujem, toto vyzera dobre.

Thanks, I will read that wiki page.

However, it may do harm to do it like this, as it may violate the principle to not draw lanes as separate OSM ways if they are not physically separated (when there are no separating kerbs).
Also some people claim drawing it your way helps navigation apps, but that does not seem true as I have driven a car through the rounadabout on the west and the GPS cannot really distinguish in which lane you are driving, so it is giving you invalid instructions.
I have already reverted some cases of these turbo-roundabouts and remodelled them using the *:lanes tags and connectivity relations, you can see e.g. at osm.org/#map=19/48.092562/17.121643 .

Zdravim, preco su hranice farnosti vlozene ako 'inner' cleny v tejto relacii? To mi nejako nedava zmysel. Uz su tam spravne ako clenovia 'subarea'.
A akoze zdroj 'survey'? To ste tie hranice presli osobne?

Zdravim, poprosim trochu zmysluplnejsie popisy sad zmien: osm.wiki/Cs:Dobr%C3%A9_koment%C3%A1%C5%99e_sad_zm%C4%9Bn

Zdravim, co su tieto oblasti Sever a Stred? Zda sa, ze to nie su casti Povazskej Bystrice (aspon dnes nie, https://www.minv.sk/?uzemne-a-spravne-usporiadanie-slovenskej-republiky&subor=233491 ). Su to nejake sidliska?

Zdravim, preco je kostol a fara vylucena z hranice farnosti?
Ako zdroj uvadzate https://www.dcza.sk/sk/schematizmus/dekanaty, ale tam vidim len velmi hrubu schematicku mapku, z ktorej tazko odvodit hranice s potrebnou presnostou pre OSM. Alebo ste vychadzali z hranic obci? Ale na niektore tie farnosti v ramci mesta PB bolo treba ist este presnejsie a tam ste ake hranice pouzili.

A aka je licencia tychto udajov? Mate povolenie z tej stranky obkreslit farnosti do OSM?

Also please pay attenton to the invalid changes to bus route relations like relation/11063368 . They are not stop_areas, but routes.

Thanks. It seems the lanes are now visible on ESRI imagery and yes, there are at least the parking spaces and a lot of lines separating the cycleways.
So I will try to improve it from the imagery.

A samozrejme uz by ste sa mohli naucit na cesty aj pridavat zdroj povolenej rychlosti (ci je tam dopravna znacka alebo zo zakona), pomocou maxspeed:type.

Lepsie by bolo si tie veci nevymyslat.
Na moste way/39908632 nebola maxspeed=90 ani vtedy ked ste to robili, ani dnes.

Zdravim, preco myslite, ze je Hričovský derivačný kanál len obcasnym vodnym tokom?
Z Ortofoto snimok to asi tazko uvidite.

A piste zmysluplnejsie popisy sad zmien, pozrite osm.wiki/Cs:Dobr%C3%A9_koment%C3%A1%C5%99e_sad_zm%C4%9Bn . Popis "Ortophoto" nikomu nic nepovie.

Also, do not use busway tags, they are deprecated, see osm.wiki/Key%3Abusway .

Na Molecovej treba dat pozor, je to tam nejake premalovane, nove cyklopruhy a tak. Ortofotomozaika je zastarala.

foot=no on Molecova? Why? What traffic sign forbids pedestrians on that street?

I guess the lanes are all wrong. How can there be lanes:both_ways=3? There surely aren't lanes where you can drive in both directions. What did you mean there? lanes=3 ?

Hi, why did you draw the cycleways as separate ways alongside the roads for cars? What barrier is there between the lanes for bikes and for cars?

Dakujem za opravu preklepu!

Ano pred niekolkymi rokmi tu bola, ale to bolo pred tym, nez sa to zmenilo na dialnicu mimo mesta.
Bol som tam nedavno a myslim si, ze tam uz 80 nie je.

Mapko to uz aktualizoval podla sucasneho stavu, nie je dobry postup vracat to do starsieho stavu podla zastaralych vedomosti. Treba si pozerat aj historiu objektov. Okrem toho ste v sade zmien napisal, ze zdroj=survey, cize akoby pred rokom ste tam videli 80 a teraz tvrdite, ze to bolo pred viac rokmi. To potom dost zavadza prave ak by si niekto historiu objektov studoval.

Okrem toho ste zmenili
maxspeed len pre vacsinu vozidiel, ale autobusom ste nechali 100, co je teda dost divne.