Zdravim, tie chodniky nie u sidewalk, ved niesu pozdlz ziadnej cesty. Tiez je otazka ci su potrebne, ked ste na celu zahradu uz dali polygon highway=pedestrian (co je tiez trochu v rozpore s highway=footway).

Dakujeme za dobry popis sady zmien.
Ake je na tychto uliciach "C"? Akoze znacena cyklotrasa na stlpoch? No neviem, ale v OSM dodnes ziadna zaznacena nie je, len nejaka navrhovana od Cyklokoalicie (ktorych su v Bratislave mraky a malokedy sa zrealizuju).
A keby tam aj skutocna cyklotrasa bola, bezne sa stava, ze ide cez usek kde je zakaz vjazdu vsetkym vozidlam (aj bicyklom), takze tam bicycle=yes nepatri. Da sa tam bicykel tlacit.
Bicykle su myslim povolene na tych uliciach, kde je v pesia zona (Zidovska,Mikulaska,Beblaveho), ale na tom chodniku pod Zigmundovou branou o bicykloch nehovori ziadna znacka.
Takze poprosim nabuduce ziadne taketo zmeny, cele odvodenie je nespravne. Dakujem

Hi, what is the source of your change? And what does "Off 2.4.24" mean?

way/115596655

Wrong change. It should be an area.

Hej, bol v tieni na dverach. Uz je otvorene a vyzera, ze z udajov sa nic nezmenilo.

way/1034419655 nebude drzadlo (handrail), ved z vacsej casti ani nejde pri chodniku. A kde aj ide, nie je na drzanie. Je to podla mna zabradlie (fence_type=railing), t.j. oddeluje ludi od aut ci ineho nebezpecia.

Please don't do changes you do not understand, just because some editor (especially iD, that is often wrong) suggests something. This change was definitely wrong.

If there is a bug/deficiency in some routing engine, in OSM we do not add wrong data to make the engine happy.

Potraviny boli len 2 tyzdne v rekonstrukcii, ved to bolo napisane na dverach. To nebolo treba tak dokladne zlikvidovat :) Esteze mame historiu.

These buildings look like towers, they do not comprise the bridge.

Please do not add fictional descriptive names to objects like node/2924731426

The primary name (in 'name' tag) should be in local language, not English, unless it calls itself officially with English name.

Tesla punjač? Ok, maybe. But a small hut representing the whole nature reserve? That is really weird tagging. Considering the reserve is tagged already around the whole lake. Also how can a building be an entrance?

Thank you. Yes, fee=yes, would be a safe starting point :) But I do not go into mapping the parking zones. I just updated a few streets I have visited.

iD editor isn't the best for experienced mappers like you and also it contains known misleading tags (like the questionable 'permit' value) and also pushes its own invented tags.

Then it is your editor that stored dgu.hr in your changeset. If you used something else (like you surveyed there), you have to write it into the changeset so others can check.

Also, "approximating" traffic signs isn't the greatest, if you do not understand their meaning in Croatian law (nether do I). Like today the streets are signed differently as some parking zones with extensive descriptions on the sign that I rather do not try to interpret :)

So if you are adding motor_vehicle=permit tags, which authority gives out those permits and who can get them? Also, some of the streets have a traffic sign of vehicle=no, not just motor_vehicle, so I am really interested in your sources, as you constantly lie that they are dgu.hr, but you can't see traffic signs there.

Hi, how is this a bike path? You didn't tag any tags allowing bicycles on this path. How do you know from aerial photos, that this is a path for bikes?
If some Strava users cycle here, it does not make it legal.

It seems Diakovce village does not use street names in their addresses oficially, so please do not add addr:street tags.

To suhlasim, ale ako ste prisli na to, ze mate takto preverit tuto adresu.