Suhlasim, je to tazke odhadnut. 'maxspeed:type' ma byt zadane len vtedy ak je zadane 'maxspeed'. Inak nema zmysel.

Inak prosim ked posuvate cestu (napr. tu Gagarinova), treba aktualizovat aj znacku 'placement' (cize kde je umiestnena ciara v OSM oproti realite). Ked ste posunuli napr. ciaru zo stredu jazdneho pruhu na deliacu ciaru, treba zmenit hodnotu v 'placement'. Tu Gagarinovu opravim, ale videl som to aj na D1, nieco som tiez opravil.

Presne tak, su 2 sposoby znacenia chodnikov a oba su v poriadku. Nema zmysel odstranovat podrobnejsie oddelene zakreslenie, ked uz si stym niekto dal tu namahu.

Myslim, ze ako zaciatocnik v OSM nemate dostatok informacii, aby ste zhodnotili ci je mapa neprehladna. Zrejme ani neviete, ze openstreetmap.org nie je jedina reprezentacia dat z OSM. Ine mapy kludne prehladne byt mozu. Takze ako pisu iny, vratte spat vsetky Vase zmeny.

A tiez piste zmlysluplnejsie popisy sad zmien. "Making map more accurate & up-to-date." je naozaj tak genericke, ze je bezcenne. Ci dokonca klamlive, ked robite pravy opak, udaje odstranujete, nespresnujete.

I have reviewed all your changes to the train station names in Slovakia. Most of them were needless as the Hungarian name already existed. Where it wasn't, your added name should have been put into "name:hu". I have fixed all the station names.
Next time be more careful and follow OSM rules on the wiki osm.wiki/Names .

Changing a public_transport=stop_position into a public_transport=station and moving it elsewhere even though train route relations needed that node and that tagging? It is clear now you have no idea what you are doing.

Sorry, but you can't just throw random descriptive names (even in English in a non-English country!) to areas in a railway station and create non-existent buildings to make them appear on the map (Rail brake). Use the proper tags for each of the object.

Dobre, dakujem. Aj toto mi potom pripada ako 'barn'.

Potom ano, alebo 'warehouse' je sklad.

Hi, what is the point of the change?
The Hungarian name was already in 'name:hu' so it wasn't needed to put it into 'name' too.

Then, what is the source of the data? You only claim Ortofotomozaika SR, but you can't see names there.

Also please use proper changeset descriptions as "tagging" does not say anything about what you have done. This is not a tag syntax fix or similar.

A preco ste odstranili lit=no, cize usek uz nie je neosvetleny?

"fine border adjustment"??? Pridali ste tu budovu typu garaz, ale oznacili ste ju hala. Takze o co vlastne ide?

Zdravim, pisete novy dom, ale ziadny ste nepridali, ten objekt je oznaceny landuse=farmyard, cize farma (cely jej areal). To je evidentne nezmysel.

Taktiez sa v OSM nesmie do nazvu pisat opis objektu ako ste to urobili "Pristresok". Takyto typ objektu treba vyjadrit prislusnymi znackami (pozrite napr. building=*). O ake pristresky tu ide, lebo zo snimok to vyzera ako dost velke budovy, ziadne pristresky. Ak su to stajne alebo nieco podobne, na to su znacky. Dajte mi vediet.

I have fixed the worst problems, but the misplaced buildings still remain. Check it on the Ortofomozaika SR imagery.

Please use the newer imagery as I see many of your additions are misplaced by 10 metres, which is very bad, and then streets run through buildings.

Also please put hungarian names into name:hu tag.

Also I see you add addresses in incomplete invalid format. Why don't you fill in addr:conscriptionnumber and addr:place as you can see in the existing addresses?

Hi, please use more descriptive descriptions of changesets, see osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments . In many cases you do not fix data, but add new one. You do not provide any source for your data (like names of objects), only Bing aerial imagery (please use the newer Ortofotomozaika SR). You are obliged to name the real source you use.

Zdravim, podla coho tato zmena typu cesty? Chodnik s povolenymi vsetkymi motorovymi vozidlami? To podla coho? Pokial viem znacka tam povoluje len niektore vozidla.

A prosim na Zapadnom Slovensku nepouzivajte snimky Bing, ale Ortofotomozaika SR, ktore su najlepsie.

Zdravim , preco na ceste way/159084765 zmena z track na path? Ta je tak siroka, ze tam naozaj chodia lesne stroje. Od znacky Pramen pod Klapmi uz naozaj len cesticka pre pesich, tak ale bolo treba cestu rozdelit, ked ma rozne vlastnosti.

Zdravim, prosim nezadavajte opisne nazvy ako "Vodarensky objekt" do znacky 'name'. Bud treba vyjadrit tuto vlastnost prislusnou znackou (tu napr. man_made=waterworks), alebo to dajte do znacky 'fixme' alebo 'note' ako poznamku aby to urobil niekto iny. Do 'name' patri len vlastne meno objektu, napr. tu ak by bolo na tabuli napisane "Vodaren Udica". Nie je pripustne si nazvy vymyslat ci pisat tam vlastne opisy. Dakujem.

Nerozumiem. StreetView sa neda pouzivat ale aj tam priamo vidite auto pod strieskou pri Delikatesy a tiez tam ide aj clovek, takze prejazdne to je. Na Ortofotomozaike je vidiet auto na severnej strane Delitakesy, smerom k trznici. Cize auta za plotom k Zeleznicnej nemocnini nemam na mysli. Ten vstup do podzemia kludne zakreslite, ked viete co to je, na Ortofotomozaike to nie je jasne, takze som to nedal.

Teda tam ta highway=service povodne uz bola, a tak som ju presunul o par metrov doprava, ale vytvorenim noveho OSM objektu. Ked teda hovorite, tak som ju skratil, pozrite ci je to lepsie.

V principe som potreboval nejaku cestu na ktoru prelozit ten dusoftov vymysel lcn=provisional, kedze to mal rovno na plote (pozrite https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=109328394 a https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=95072514).

Ano je to tam take osemetne, minimalne po budovu Delikatesy stoja na Ortofotomozaike auta, zrejme k tomu obchodu. Ak teda cesta konci tam, mozem to dalej zmenit na chodnik. Ten usek je pod strechou, takze to nie je dobre vidiet. Pozrite teraz. Dakujem za upozornenie.