Hi, why the deletion? Is the stationary shop gone? But there is now free room for a shop, next time add shop=vacant (see shop=vacant), instead of pure deletion.

Hi, what is the source of this name? Please always add sources to your changeset.

Zdravim, k comu su dobre tieto skratky ZA a BA? To mi znie ako kody okresov. Okrem toho v Bratislave short_name ani nebolo. Do ref by patrilo nejake cislo, ako co uz mame v city_id. Ine mesta 'ref' takehoto typu nemaju. Ak to ma nejaky zmysel a je to skratkou mesta (nie okresu a poprosim zdroj), tak by som navrhoval nejaku inu znacku, kludne to short_name).

Plne nazvy som presunul do znacky 'official_name' ak by nahodou boli potrebne, a v 'name' zostali nazvy bez 'ulica'.

HI, please provide proper descriptions of changesets, see osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments .
a hundred changesets all with "#osmhr-project-11 #potres-kod-petrinje" aren't informational for others outside the #potres-kod-petrinje task. Thanks

Ok, I can see dgu.hr imagery in the JOSM editor, which you also use. But I see no mines in the aerial imagery, as of course the mines are underground. So that wasn't the real source for the data. You say some demining expert put some OSM notes on the map. I wonder how precise he could describe the mine area polygons. But OK, so just please next time quote the real data source, thanks.

In OSM it is not allowed to make things "well visible" by putting random personal remarks into the name tag. You have to tag objects properly so that all consumers (people and applications) can properly understand what they are. Then they will be well visible.

It seems the 'hazard' tag was recently voted upon:
hazard=*
It may be needed to add the boundary=hazard tags to the areas you have created and probably to remove the 'military' tags unless the military still actively uses the areas. Thanks.

Hi, thanks for adding the speed information, but please pay attention to the train and bus relations that run over those rails and roads. When you split a way, always check that the new way is properly placed in the relations. In the JOSM editor it should be easy to check, and it even warns you about the relations the road is part of. Always load the shole area around the road you are going to split, so that the relations load too. If you only load roads/rails using some filter (e.g. Overpass API), the relations will not load and bad things happen. Sadly you have damaged train routes in Wien in this way. I'll fix some, but please pay more attention next time, thanks.

No myslim, ze tych povymyslanych nazvov je tu viac, vsetky tie "chodnik, cesta, sesta ..." ci to co je "v Strednom Sliaci". A odpoved asi nedostaneme, autorka nie je velmi aktivna. Mnohe uz su opravene.

Hallo, der Pfeilsymbol mag problematisch sein, deshalb ist im fuer 'name' der -> oder => symbol auch erlabt. Der – Symbol ist fuer public_transport:version=2 relationen nicht gueltig (route=train).

Zdravim, nezabudnite poopravovat tie relacie vlakov, zase sa Vam pokazilo poradie clenov (napr. v EN 477), kedze ste rozdelili kolaje na viac casti. Treba si relacie pred odoslanim vzdy skontrolovat.

Zdravim, dakujeme za aktualizacie.

Podla coho sa ale cesta way/570704756 nazyva "Partizansky chodnik" (este aj s gramatickymi chybami) ? Uvadzajte prosim Vase zdroje.

A opatrnejsie s vyberom objektov, cely les relation/1454038 sa asi nenazyva Teplica. Co presne ste chceli nazvat Teplicou?

Suhlasim, ten barrier=entrance do arealu letiska je velmi podozrivy, dam tam 'fixme'. Ale pristup k nemu je cez tu sukromnu cestu, takze dostat sa tam velmi neda.

Dakujem, ano potom tam treba pridat branu. Ja to ale spravim, lebo uz mam tu oblast rozpracovanu, tak aby sme nekolidovali. Dakujem za info.
Ale ina sukromny pristup (access=private) tam uz nastaveny bol, takze je zrejme, ze nie je verejne pristupna, aj bez umeleho odpajania cesty. Toto prosim uz nerobte, ked to nezodpoveda fyzickemu umiestneniu cesty. Dakujem

Zdravim, preco podla Vas cesta way/169242001 neexistuje? A ked neexistuje, preco ste ju len odpojili od Janosikovej? Ale na vsetkych snimkoch je vidiet, takze nerozumiem tejto zmene.

Obmedzenia vjazdu podla Mapillary .

Ano, v katastri to je, ale v inych obciach to tam ke aj roky dopredu nez nieco zacun stavat. Je to len plan. Ked ste to teda uz videli rozkopane (lebo ani na Maxare este nie je), tak super, dakujem.

bus 11

Zdravim, su tie ulice fakt vo vystavbe? Alebo este len planovane (highway=proposed)

O ziadnom rozhodeni liniek nepisem. V tejto sade zmien ste Vy odstranili nastupiste 99 z linky 857 (co ste sam potvrdili). Pytam sa teda, ako v takomto stave ma aplikacia vediet, ze bus stoji len na 99 a nie na 10?

No a ako viete, ze z linky 857 ludia vystupia na nast.99? Preco nie na 10, cez ktore tiez prechadza? A ako viete ze nestoji na dalcich 50 nastupistiach, popri ktorych na ceste z Brna prechadza?
Ako to ma pochopit navigacna aplikacia? No presne tym, ze len spravne nastupistia budu sucastou relacie linky. Tak ako to popisuju wiki stranky, ktore systematicky ignorujete.

A uz zrazu je 99 miesto zastavenia vozidla ako pisete (stop_position)? Zaujimave, ze to tvrdite, pritom ste to sam zmenili na nastupiste (platform) v strede cesty.