Hi, traffic_calming must also be placed on the node shared with the road, not on a footway crossing it, as otherwise cars will not "see it". It is primarily information for cars, pedestrians do not care. E.g. at node/7965032707 .

Zdravim, uvadzajte zdroj Vasich zmien. Poposuvali ste budovy, ale stale nesedia. Inak ten bod highway=turning_circle je nepotrebny, ked je cely obluk cesty zakresleny.

It was inconsistent, you could then also make another shortcut way from Prievozska to Kosicka.
Hodzovo namestie is a more complicated junction. But, you make a separate road when the lanes are separated by a physical barrier or at least the white bars, or a double white line (see e.g. Namestie 1. maja). That is not the case here. Yes, there is also the junction of Bajkalska/Prievozska that has many roads mapped separately, but it would be hard to model that one with a simple square as we have here on Kosicka.

Yes, it is great to set footway=crossing on the footway from the sidewalk to the crossing node. But not more than that. Set all the crossing*=* tags on that crossing node shared with the way.
You can also set footway=sidewalk on the footways parallel and close to a road (but where it crosses the road make it footway=crossing).
Yes, the iD editor invented the crossing=marked tag (without any discussion and necessity) and offers to set it on various objects. But the rest of the OSM users and other editors are against this, so we just have data damaged by this iD editor. There are already talks about removing this editor from the osm.org website as its authors have many own decisions like this.

We haven't yet decided in the Slovak OSM community how to tag these residential parkings (for residents free, others pay) which are being introduced in parts of Bratislava. But there are the 'fee' (takes time of day), 'charge' (takes amount) and various other conditional tags (see osm.wiki/Conditional_restrictions).
The notes and descriptions are best written in the local language as probably local people will read it. Of course, locals may know the situation better even without OSM, and it is the visitors that need the tagging help. But then it is best to express it in the proper tags.
Also, you can display 'note' and 'fixme' tags in OsmAnd if you enable "Mapper assistant" in map details setting.
You can visit the Slovak OSM community forum at
https://groups.google.com/g/osm_sk if you want to discuss this.

I mean what does the fixme on thsoe sidewalks mean? What needs to be done there? We can add footway=sidewalk but other than that, what is wrong there? Do you mean to remove embankment=yes from the road and sidewalks and draw the embankment on both sides separately?

Well, in reality it is no right turn, you juct go straight. It is forbidden in OSM to change data to achieve some result in a particular application. If you think it should speak a command, this needs to be fixed in OsmAnd source. There are many places in OSM that have this junction geometry and you can't fix them all, and shouldn't. I do you OsmAnd routing extensively too, and yes it does not speak turns sometimes so you have to stare at the screen often. But you must not make OSM data wrong just to make OsmAnd happy.

OsmAnd does route to vehicle=destination roads so there should be no problem with the tag. If you put your destination before the car wash, it should route you to the correct road (before the building, not on the motorway).

Vehicle=destination was correct, there is a traffic sign forbidding through-traffic through this fuel station (people could make a shortcut to the motorway exit.
Also, OsmAnd should route you through vehicle=destination roads just fine, even though with some penalty.

So if you wanted a vacuum cleaner then there is the amenity=vacuum_cleaner tag, see amenity=vacuum_cleaner . Please use the OSM wiki to lookup tags.

On node node/1293493765 you even changed traffic_lights to "marked" thus uncontrolled without lights. Why are you damaging the data? Also you never provide real source of your changes, you only claim Bing, but you can't see traffic lights on Bing imagery.

Hi, as I said, stop with the crossing=marked tags immediately. In the case here, not that it is just duplicate to crossing=uncontrolled, but it is plain wrong. You added it to way/189739844, however that crossing has a traffic light as seen on node/2003329699 . So your tagging is conflicting with the existing data. Also please do not add any crossing=* tags on way, as the needed tags are already on the shared nodes where the road and footways intersect.

Some needless changes again, traffic_signals:direction is useless on a oneway road. Also do not add e.g. departures_board and public_transport=platform tags on railway=platform lines that do not represent the public transport stop, e.g. way/242889699, there is node/1537525256 for the platform. You are just creating duplicate and useless (unnamed) platforms.

Zdravim, zial v tejto sade zmien skoro vsetko zle, chybne poposuvane budovy v Bahoni, cesty pri Avione...

Hi, please do not add needless Italian names to objects, that do not have an Italian name.

Sorry, but how can there be turn:lanes=merge_to_left, if there is no other lane to merge to on a single lane road?

Zdravim, ten nazov "polnohospodarske druzstvo prievoz" asi nema byt len na tej malej budove, ale na celom areali druzstva (farmyard). Viete zakreslit celu oblast druzstva?

Hi, thanks for improving the positions of the streets in Zohor. Bu that's just because the previous editor moved them totally off. Othewise we have better imagery than Bing available in Slovakia. Also please do not use the duplicate crossing=marked tags on crossings. Use crossing=uncontrolled and crossing_ref=zebra . Yes, I assume it's the crap iD editor proposing those, so please do not listen to it.

Hi, please do not move buildings in Zohor. Their position is already wrong (somebody has drawn most of the city buildings using Bing, while we have a more precise cadastre data available), but your shifts aren't making them better, you move them in the wrong direction. Also, you describe the changeset as "Added village green" but you have added none, just moved some buildings.

A otvaracie hodiny sa nezapisuju po slovensky, ale anglickymi skratkami dni, pozrite opening_hours=*. Dakujem.

Francuzska restauracia bolo asi spravne (https://www.hoteldevin.sk/francuzska-restauracia), L'Art je napisane na vedlajsom hoteli Park Inn.