Preco ste odobrali aj bicycle=no, ked pisete o bicycle=yes ?

What is the point of this change? Just adding postcodes on random shops? We already have postcodes on addresses in the building and also whole postcode boundaries in the city.

These changes are unneded.

Please do not add a standalone addr:postcode on random shops, there are better addresses nearby.

And finally stop with the bogus changeset description of "The triangle is not valid" !

Hi, please don't add duplicate and incomplete addresses like node/12230507547. Also do not put outdoor_seating=no on objects like building where they do not make much sense.
The building does have 18 levels (you count the ground floor too in OSM into building:levels).
The position of the parkings at LIGET and parking roof are very imprecise. I am not sure which Ortofotomozaika you used, because the old one (2020) does not show the building yet, the new one (2023) would show you you have placed the objects wrongly. So that is weird. I will fix it, but please improve your process.

The grass areas at Topolcianska look right, but there is no real wild grassland in this area, it is all managed grass. See the description at natural=grassland .
Also you should have connected the big grass area to the adjoining water polygon of Chorvátske rameno, as there is no gap between them (grass touches the water).

Taktiez prosim nekreslit naslepo podla LIDARu (ak ste nesnimali tento mesiac), lebo moze byt zastaraly. Napr. cesta way/938447468 je na snikmach ESRI zasypana nejakym materialom, takze nie je priechodna. Samozrejme ak ste tam boli teraz v januari a material tam uz nie je, potom je to v poriadku.

Zdravim, prosim nerobte zmeny na takom velkom uzemi v jednej sade zmien.

Dakujem za pridanie novych lesnych chodnickov pri Dunaji.

Pozor ale na duplicity, napr. cesta way/1349024940 uz existovala ako way/62364182, stacilo ju upresnit. Alebo su tam naozaj dve prekryvajuce sa cesticky?

Tiez nemyslim, ze tie lesne cesticky je potrebne kreslit tak dokonalo so stovkami bodov.

A Vy mate vlastny LIDAR? Ak nie, a pouzivate nejaky zdroj, treba uviest jeho nazov, aby sa tie zmeny dali overit.
Dakujem

Hi, why don't you specify what markings are at the crossings? Just a 'yes' value does not add much information.

Zdravim, ako som uz pisal, menej tych reklam.

A nepresuvajte spravne umiestnene podniky na nezmyselne vymyslene pozicie, ako napr. tu na chodnik pred budovou.

Otazka je, ci to vie rozlisit podla krajiny. Zda sa, ze ano, skusim to nahlasit.

No ale preco odklikavate chybne navrhy od iD, ked na fotke ste videli spravny napis?

Skor tam bude meno doktora.
Slovaci tam ist nemozu?

Zdravim, to je naozaj takyto oficialny nazov? Nezda sa mi to.

Teda pri tom kruhovom objazde chapem co ste chceli dosiahnut, ale treba to urobit inak.
Priechody pre chodcov OK, to obnovim.
Ale zmena krizovatky 517 s najazdom na D1 uplne zbytocna a chybna.

Napisal som Vam vo viacerych sadach zmien a na ziadnu ste nereagovali, takze ak tvrdite, ze "bez slova diskuze" tak klamete. Okrem toho som prepojenia medzi jazdnymi pruhmi zakreslil, len ich mozno nevidite.
Vasich 8 paralelnych jazdnych pruhov urcite nebolo spravne, takze sa netvarte, ze to po Vasich upravach bolo nejako vhodne na navigovanie.

Na navigaciu autom pouzivam vylucne OSM, takze sa snazim dosiahnut, aby znacenie bolo spravne. Samozrejme zalezi od aplikacie, ake znacenie uz podporuje. Ale vymyslat ci ciary a oddelene cesty preto, aby (ktovie ktora) navigacia fungovala podla zelania nie je v OSM spravna cesta.

Aroganciou zavani akurat Vase spravanie, ked zacinate s OSM, nemate nastudovane ako sa znacia jazdne pruhy a hned idete "vylepsovat" dolezite krizovatky v roznych statoch.

A "v zapale boja" by bol ten lepsi pripad. Ako pozeram tych ostatnych, skor nevedia co maju robit Maproulette im to nevysvetli ani po nich neskontroluje. Aky to ma potom zmysel...

No ved prave, zial mnohi pouzivatelia v zapale boja pre Maproulette robia plno chyb.

Taketo veci ale netreba robit ani inde, nie len v Bratislave.

Zdravim, preco pridavate zbytocne body ako node/11088568698/history a potom to zase dalsich pouzivatelov matie pridavat tam nezmyselne znacky. Chodnik je nad a na garazach, takze treba dat prislusne znacky layer, nie spolocne body, akoby boli v rovnakej urovni.

Again, half of the changes incorrect, not fixing any intersections, actually introducing new ones.
Looks like you don't really understand what you are doing here. I just wonder why somebody from maproulette does not check this damage after you.

Znovu nezmyselne zmeny. Vsetko vratene do povodneho stavu. Prestante nicit cesty v Openstreetmap. Nastudujte si najprv pravidla, ako som Vam uz poslal.

Zmena bola vratena do povodneho stavu.

Ano, zase nezmyselna demolacia korektnych udajov? Vy necitate co Vam piseme?