Zdravotne stredisko uz je zakreslene ako cela budova. Takze tento nazov je duplicitny.

Zdravim, chodniky popri tychto cestach su uz zakreslene samostatnymi ciarami. V takom pripade sa na cestu dava sidewalk=separate (ze su zakreslene samostatne), nie 'both' (akoby cesta este mala dalsie postranne chodniky okrem tych zakreslenych). Taktiez je potom zbytocne sidewalk:surface (je to duplicita k hodnotam surface=* na jednotlivych chodnikoch).

Zdravim, oba potencialne bunkre, co ste nepomenovali, su podla wikidat zaniknute. Obe miesta poznam a podla mna tam nic nie je.

It is because the website of the building at https://www.apartmany-bernard.sk/ only offers selling the apartments, not renting to tourists. Of course, the permanent owners can then rent them to tourists individually, which is then facilitated via the porter service (that part is on the website too). So if you confirmed that some are indeed rented to tourists, we can now tag it somehow. But not the whole building is for tourists.

Preco je na tie lesne cesty zakaz vstupu pre vsetkych, aj lesnikov?

For access tagging precedence see access=* . 'vehicle' is more broad and contains motor_vehicle so if motor_vehicle is specified too, it overrides vehicle.
The problem was that 'designated' means 'road is specifically meant for all motor vehicles'. It does not mean 'only some vehicle types specified on traffic sign'. So it was not disallowing any motor vehicles.
I changed it to vehicle=private which means only the vehicles allowed by owner (possibly via the signs). Still some routing engines ignore this (and route into the area), but it is now more correct.

Nezda sa mi, ze by zelena isla do budovy (pozrite https://www.freemap.sk/#map=19/49.158603/20.224932&layers=X ), ale skontrolujte, ked tam budete. Dakujem.

Yes, is seems the area was rebuilt. There is 5 years old imagery of Ortofotomozaika SR where the parking does not exist. But there exists Ortofotomozaika of 2022, also ESRI that has the parking. mapBox imagery even has the building in different shape. It seems it was all rebuilt.

I understand the building contains apartments/flats for long-term residents, not for tourist. At least the website does not say any thing like that. It is also not tagged tourism=apartments. But you added the parking as access=customers. So what customers are those if on the tourists?

Okrem toho "Tatraheim" 2km ma v OSM len 1.77 km a "Tatraheim 3km" len 2.2km, takze nieco nebude este hotove. Minimalne usek do Gerlachova ma byt asi v relacii trasy dvakrat, kedze sa po nom ma aj vracat. Aspon tak to chapem, lebo stupanie a klesanie ma byt rovnaky pocet metrov.
Ale nechapem ako je mozne, ze na scheme tras na stranke https://tatraheim.sk/ , kde su vykreslene na mapy.cz nejdu tatraheim 2 a tatraheim 3 po rovnakej trase, ale jemne sa odlisuju. Ved mapy.cz to berie z OSM. Ci ma iny zdroj? Je to potom v OSM spravne?

A ak by trasy nesli po existujucich cestach (tak ako tych par usekov, kde idu rovno cez les a nie je tam cesta, tak aj tak musia ist po nejakom fyzickom objekte. Ak tam ziadna cesta nie je tak sa dava highway=piste. Ak trasy nejdu po ziadnej ceste (tak ako to mate teraz), tak vlastne "visia vo vzduchu" a su v podstate v OSM chybne. Treba to teda urcite upratat.

Dakujem, toto vyzera dobre, ide po existujucich trasach a cestach.
Ale podla popisu na https://tatraheim.sk/ nejde o bezkarsku trasu, ale lyziarsku turisticku trat. Neviem co to presne znamena, ale oni sami to rozlisuju, tak 'nordic' asi nebude spravna hodnota. Ale neviem ktora hodnota z piste:type=* je spravnejsia.

Zdravim, tie bezkarske trate su samostatne vysekane v lese, ze nejdu po existujucich lesnych cestach? Lebo tak ste to urobili. Podla snimok Ortofoto sa ale zda, ze vacsinou kopiruju lesne cesty, az na par usekov. Len ste ich zakreslili 4 metre od prislusnych lesnych ciest tak sa pytam ako to je. Mozem to opravit, len dajte vediet. Podla fotiek na ich stranke to vyzera, ze idu po lesnych cestach, nemaju vysekane samostatne koridory v lese.

Ja som to spravil podla svojich fotiek aj podla leteckych snimok kde uz most nie je a stale je ten nahradny chodnik na zapad od mosta. Som to nejako spravil, snad to niekto overi.
Aon ten tobogan tiez uz par rokov nie je na fotkach, ale otazka je, ci tam nie je len niekedy (sezonne).

Zase nejaky vynalez? Odkedy sa na cesty v pumpach davat drive-through? Ci je na tejto jednej pumpe mozne natankovat a zaplatit priamo z auta? Cize je tam obsluha?

Hi, the parking at Bernard Apartmany is awfully imprecise (I'll improve it from aerial imagery), but otherwise great additions, like the piped stream. Thanks!

Zdravim, na way/52490470 ani ziadna budova ine je, tak preco je to bytovka?

No bol som tam tiez a nezda sa mi, ze by chodnik bol presne na mieste mosta. Kedze cast povodneho chodnika na most tam aj zostal (a je zaslepeny), tak nie je uplne mozne, aby na jeho mieste bol novy chodnik.

Na bankomatoch ide nazov banky len do 'operator', nie do 'brand' ani 'name'.

Dakujem za zrusenie mosta, ktory tam uz nie je. Ale preco ste paralelnu cestu po zemi presunuli na miesto mosta?

I have seen tactile paving at crossing at node/4318560646 .