Pardon, asi to kedysi bolo jedno ci su na konci alebo na zaciatku. Ale OSM Inspector vyzaduje zastavky na zaciatku relacie a je to uvedene aj na osm.wiki/Public_transport#Service_routes . Opravim to v tom clanku o Bratislave.

master_route relacia moze mat aj jedneho clena, nevadi to.

Nastupistia dajte prosim na zaciatok clenov relacie. Ostatne pozriem.

Super, dakujem. Tak nakoniec tam cisla nastupist su, v 'ref' (ale su na bodoch stop_position). Prehodte ich na na body 'platform' a do znacky 'local_ref'.

Linky MHD by mali vyzerat takto: osm.wiki/Bratislava#Mestsk%C3%A1_hromadn%C3%A1_doprava . Body public_transport=stop_position su nepovinne.

Tak hej ma. Minimalne ten OsmAnd cez to pekne odnaviguje v rezime pesiaka (este s par chybickami). U plno ostatnych znaciek v OSM by sa tiez o tom dalo pochybovat. Ale zrejme to niekoho bavi a preto to tam moze byt. Len teda ked uz do toho zasahujete tak treba to robit podla pravidiel. Znackam, ktorym clovek nerozumie (ani ja niektorym:)) tak ich nema pridavat a ani odoberat.

Samozrejme potom by bolo 10 nerozlisitelnych nastupist s rovnakym nazvom. Tak ale na mieste asi maju nejake rozlisenie (napr. nastupiste 2), tak to sa da do 'local_ref'. Ak nemaju cisla ale rozlisuju ich tymi destinaciami, tak sa da pouzit to.

Nejde o to, aka aplikacia to pouziva, ale ako to ma byt :) Pouziva to napr. OsmAnd na navigaciu po MHD, kontroluje to OSM Inspector, vykresluje to aj osm.org (osm.org/#map=18/48.43378/17.80465&layers=T).

Zdravim, relacia autobusu 203415 nesplna podmienky pre public_transport:version=2, takze preco ste to pridali a co ste v nej opravili?

Zdravim, podla akej schemy mapujete tieto linky MHD? Lebo sucasna PTv2 nema znacky ako 'direction', nema mat v 'name' poznamky ako "spat" ci "tam".
Nemozu mat ako zastavku/nastupiste bod reprezentujuci stanicu a pod. Tieto linky MHD v Hlohovci az po Trnavu (napr. 203415) su dost nefunkcne.

Dobry den, nastupistia sa nazyvaju podla toho v akej stanici stoja (tu Hlohovec, AS), nie podla toho kam z nich smeruju linky.

Zdravim, na zaklade coho by na tychto chodnikoch mala byt povolena jazda bicyklov?

Why is way/40123440 footway only?
How the the cars get to the parking places on the side of the house 922 (east)? Because the road way/225172644 is for 'olo' company motor vehicles only. Or did the situation change since 2022 when you changed that road?

Opravim

Potom super, dakujem.

way/1225292052 are new houses not yet visible on Ortofotomozaika. It would be clear from their housenumbers.
Why did you not check the ZBGIS source tagged on them, to see what it says?
Please stop the damage already. Do not use advanced tools like Osmose when you do not check object history and do not know OSM rules.

Prosim, ak ste si este neopravili import adries a typov domov, nepridavajte na domy building=terrace, znamena to zrejme nieco ine ako v registri adries. building=terrace Ked pridavame jednotlive adresy tak sa snazime domy rozdelovat podla toho a teda by na Slovensku 'terrace' ani nemalo existovat (len kym domy niesu zakreslene presne jednotlivo).

Please read the definition of building=terrace before you use it: building=terrace . All the terraces you added are wrong.

Preco uplne nezmyselne posuny obrysov parkoviska pri Lidli? node/8617930123
Na Ortofotomozaike (ktoru uvadzate ako jediny zdroj) parkovisko ani nie je. Ale je v katastri, z ktoreho bolo pekne obkreslene.

Taktiez uplne nespravne pouzitie building=terrace, na domoch ktore su rozdelene na jednotlive domy, takze uz nejde o jeden dom tvoriaci radovu zastavbu (terrace). building=terrace

way/1091869940 preco vymaz source? Na Ortofoto stale je.

Ake chyby z Osmose ste na tychto objektoch akoze vyriesili?

Hi, if you try to add railway speeds, why did you need to damage an adjacent street at way/207011621, removing trolley wires and nodes from it, thus worsening its geometry?