The roads around way/225717193 are no service=drive-through ...

Thanks, I have also updated the area with my surveyed data. Good that the road is now fixed as navigations would really give strange instructions from those 2 parallel roads just 2 metres apart with different access restrictions.

Thanks, see osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only

Also note that Google street view is forbidden to be used for OSM, so only add objects you have visited, or are visible in the allowed aerial imagery in your editor).

For the memorials and atworks, there are tags that can be used instead of putting a description into the name.
E.g. for the horse statue at node/3827143367 I have added statue=animal (see e.g. statue=*) and artwork_subject=horse (see artwork_subject=*, looks like 'figurative' would be more proper value). Sometimes it is good to put the description into 'description' tag if tags cannot express the object fully yet, but maybe in future tags will become available (new ones are created /agreed upon constantly).

Hi, please always provide sources where you got your data from.

Also don't forget to quote your sources, as there are no details of the bar on its website. Also you could notice there is already a restaurant with almost same name (typoed) at this place which you could update instead of duplicate it.

"Take it or leave it" may be the attitude at Google maps, but OSM expects some data quality.

Also way/1175906187 service=drive-through means something different (you should check wiki descriptions before using tags, e.g. service=drive-through ). The splits of the path by 'other stuff' marked as a service road with less restictions than the parking parts does make even less sense.

I have photos from that place incidentally so I have noticed the errors and will fix that road. I just want you to understand so that you do not introduce such random invalid tagging elsewhere.

Yeah, it is blocked by cars, that probably park there illegally (blocking whole footway) thus it is not good to put that into OSM (even though OSM maps what is really on the ground, but cars standing on a footway does not mean official parking place or a parking aisle). Even if they parked there legally, it would be no parking aisle but a amenity=parking + parking=lane or something similar.

And you still haven't explained where all the other invalid access permission tags came from.

I see no name on the memorial from the photo. An object does not need to have a name in OSM, this is no Google maps. Instead you could have put the inscription text into the 'inscription' tag.

You cannot copy anything from Google maps as it is forbidden for OSM. Second, Google is a dump ground of random descriptions of objects put into names so it even is useless to copy anything from Google maps.

You must check the history of the objects in OSM you change. Here you would see that multiple people already tagged it that they do not know its name. A statue of a horse is a description or property of the object and can be described by proper tags (see e.g. statue=*), it is not its name. If there is indeed no name, there is a noname=yes tag for that.

Then I ask where does the name on node/10936899407 come from?

There is only one added memorial in this changeset: way/1176332523

If you have visited the objects, put source=survey on them.

And there should be no space in "Su, We-Th" in opening hours. Other than that, rest of the tags seem OK (if contact:facebook can be written without full URL). Thanks.

'Temny' does not mean 'late/night' but even if it would, it does not mean the bar is oficially called that name.
So can you confirm you have personally seen such name written on the bar? It's website does not have such a name yet, but it is in construction.

What does some https://untappd.com website not related to the bar proove? And oma.sk uses OSM data, so just shows what you have input, so it is no proof either.

No urcite nie, uz v case ked som to menil ja boli na stranke oba nazvy na roznych miestach (treba si precitat viac ako len nadpis). Aj samotna adresa stranky sa pocas vystavby zmenila. Treba si pozerat aj historiu objektov, asi bol dovod preco som to po dostavbe zmenil. A ked ste tam boli (zakreslili ste objekty vo vnutornom dvore inka nie su vidiet), museli ste napisy na budove vidiet, ze su uz po novom.

Tak tato ulica urcite jednosmerna nie je. Odkial to mate? (ziadny zdroj)

Sadly, you created some mess here. way/951538764/ is a footway (sidewalk), no service road, no parking aisle. Also most of the added tags are just made up, there is no traffic sign about horses nor bicycles or motor vehicles.
What were you trying to do?

Also why have you singled out this small footwalk into the changeset and then another change in it is far away in Ivanka pri Dunaji?
Please always group changes close to each other into a single changeset, not distant geographic areas.

Is the name "Pamätník holokaustu" written on the memorial, or is it in some reliable source? If not, such a subjective description does not belong into the 'name' tag.
Similarly, is the "Equine Statue" (in English) the official name of the statue in Slovakia?

Hi, what is the source of the data? You have to provide that in the changeset tags, or better on evry object you add, change. You cannot see memorials on the aerial imagery you claim to use.

Also learn to add proper changeset descriptions: osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments .
Thanks

Zdravim, preco vymena nazvov? Na mieste vsade pisu len Apollo Nivy, povodny nazov bol Nove Apollo, ale zmenil sa, je to vidiet aj na webstranke.

Aj v sucasnom ZBGISe https://zbgis.skgeodesy.sk/mkzbgis/sk/kataster?pos=48.150213,17.112705,18 pri pouziti mapy Kataster nehnutelnosti (ruzova ikona) a nasledne prepinani vrstvy podkladovej vrstvy ZBGIS tam nazov "Janska" preblikne podobne ako na inych uliciach. Po nacitani udajov uz nazov nevidno, na tejto ulici akosi ziadny nazov nie je, na rozdiel od okolitych, kde sa explicitne vykresluje.

Hi, just street name and post code seems quite useless as an address.

Hi, where does the name part 'temny' come from?