oops, no it is just a footpath to access the church

no idea about this edits or rights, but the correct url is probably http://map.n-somerset.gov.uk/publicrightsofway.html

is the entrance - the perils of predictive text.
Thanks

HI Chillly,
I was just correcting the Chinese to chinese (as OSM is fussy about capitalisation in tags) which Rogero added on their edit of this way.
I think you are correct about it being fast_food rather than restaurant (especially as it has the tag takeaway=only).
As you are more knowledgeable about this takeaway than me I would be happy for you to update this way.
Thanks for bringing this to my attention, happy mapping.

hi,
you haven't tagged way/393459010 way/393459010#map=17/53.70912/-0.80197
Is it a track?

Why have you changed the name? This section of road is called De Grey Terrace according to the signs and the addresses of the houses on it

The street sign says "Tang Hall Lane 124-138" which is what is down this street.

Also "addr:housenumber" should not be used for ways according to the wiki

The houses on the east side of this street are Railway View and the houses on the west side of this street are Northfield Terrace, this is clearly indicated by local street signs.
Why have you changed the street name from "Northfield Terrace / Railway View" to "Northfield Terrace"?
(There are slightly more Railway View houses on this street)

No, I think your word order is probably the correct one.

Hi Derrick,
I renamed North End/Wildwood Terrace to match what the street sign at the end of the road said - as highlighted by note #382035
Aligned the buildings of King Alfred School to better match the bing aerial image
Tidied up the roundabout at the junction of North End Way/Spaniards Rd/Heath Street to better match what was on the ground
Moved the edge of Hampstead Heath so it wasn't crossing the pavement.

I wasn't able to conclusively mark where Clowns Day Nursery or Cinderella Path are on the map. Also not able to satisfactorily accurately enough to mark the section of North End Way that has no adjoining pavement, or the path pedestrians have to take through the woods to the southwest of it.
If you get the chance to resurvey these features and mark them on the map that would be wonderful.

Are there really four post offices in Elvington Industrial Estate?

node/3792858161 looks a little peculiar
node/3792858161 is it definitely part of the building?

corrected, thanks

is okay, is fixed now.

Hi Gerd,
If you go down the road in person you will see there is also an official sign designating this point as a Passing Place
This sign is also visible on google streetview www.google.co.uk/maps/@53.9243057,-1.0124602,3a,15y,212.23h,84.02t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1ssRmNgmC1loXgi01OiK7rig!2e0!7i13312!8i6656
YP

Hi GerdP,
How about correcting my obvious spelling mistake or message me and ask what I meant to type, rather than going round deleting tags and information from the map.
YP

Why does the Acomb Police Station need marking on the map a second time?
It is already adequately marked on the map by way/130352231

Hi sorry if I came across as unfriendly, I guess frustration at someone undoing my work out of misunderstanding of tags. Perhaps your global scale made it look if you were changing things without knowledge of local circumstances.
I am not sure what you mean about the wiki redirecting, the link I gave (which didn't render as a link last time: bar=* ) doesn't redirect to anywhere for me.

I am confused; the osm wiki says layer tag should be used to describe relative vertical differences of overlapping nodes or tags but "is not suitable to define vertical relationships of adjoining, nearby or distant elements or areas."
Would the embankment tag be more appropriate for way/140324063 ?

I have to agree with will_p, have you read the wiki that says the same as will_p is saying wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bar , for example should I edit all the bars that have toilets from toilets=yes to amenity=toilets?