Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Since you requested a review, I looked over your changes. Looks super, nice job! Thanks for your contribution.

Yeah many are definitely being done by the same system or group. The thing that sucks is that AFAICT they are always on behalf of real businesses. If they were all misplaced or fake I'd have no problem just wiping them out en masse. But I just hate to straight up delete a node that's a real business with real info, only issue being the tag format. (I hate to punish the unaware business owners and miss out on real data for OSM, I mean. The marketing companies, however, can kiss my ass)

I've decided personally for now the ones that seem at least somewhat legitimate I'll fix (for now) but I've started removing many of them, see changeset/149275186

Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Since you requested a review, I looked over your changes. Everything seems great to me! Only issue is that you removed a restaurant tag from the nearby Little Dom's. Looks like another mapper already came through and fixed that!
Anyway, Cheech's tags look great. Thanks for your contribution!

Oh, I forgot to mention - One suggestion is that the changeset comment should be used to describe what changes you made. (The justification is fine to have in addition, but the primary reason is to summarize what you changed.)

Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Since you requested a review, I looked over your recent changes. Looks great! I don't see any issues. Thanks for your contributions!

Howdy! Since you requested a review, I looked over your changes here. Looks great overall! Probably intentional, but I just wanted to make sure it was intentional that you tagged an advisory speed limit (usually orange signs for curves, exits, etc) on the on/off ramps.
Also, looks like you (probably accidentally) moved a parking lot feature from a church lot to a neighborhood. I went ahead and fixed that.
Thanks for your contributions!

Hi! Your addition here has major problems with its tags. If you are the business owner, welcome to OSM! Please reply here or message me and we can get it fixed! If you are a marketing company creating accounts on behalf of clients, please review your process and learn more about OSM's tagging schema before making more edits. There's nothing wrong with adding businesses, but the way you're doing it is not helpful to anyone. (And likely does not improve SEO ranking.) For now, I've reverted your edit.

changeset/149275186

Hi! Your addition here has major problems with its tags. If you are the business owner, welcome to OSM! Please reply here or message me and we can get it fixed! If you are a marketing company creating accounts on behalf of clients, please review your process and learn more about OSM's tagging schema before making more edits. There's nothing wrong with adding businesses, but the way you're doing it is not helpful to anyone. (And likely does not improve SEO ranking.) For now, I've reverted your edit.

changeset/149275186

Hi! Your addition here has major problems with its tags. If you are the business owner, welcome to OSM! Please reply here or message me and we can get it fixed! If you are a marketing company creating accounts on behalf of clients, please review your process and learn more about OSM's tagging schema before making more edits. There's nothing wrong with adding businesses, but the way you're doing it is not helpful to anyone. (And likely does not improve SEO ranking.) For now, I've reverted your edit.

changeset/149275186

Hi! Your addition here has major problems with its tags. If you are the business owner, welcome to OSM! Please reply here or message me and we can get it fixed! If you are a marketing company creating accounts on behalf of clients, please review your process and learn more about OSM's tagging schema before making more edits. There's nothing wrong with adding businesses, but the way you're doing it is not helpful to anyone. (And likely does not improve SEO ranking.) For now, I've reverted your edit.

changeset/149275186

Hi! Your addition here has major problems with its tags. If you are the business owner, welcome to OSM! Please reply here or message me and we can get it fixed! If you are a marketing company creating accounts on behalf of clients, please review your process and learn more about OSM's tagging schema before making more edits. There's nothing wrong with adding businesses, but the way you're doing it is not helpful to anyone. (And likely does not improve SEO ranking.) For now, I've reverted your edit.

changeset/149275186

Wow, this is a really tricky intersection! I looked over it and see no problems. (At first I thought I had a better way, got halfway through trying it, and changed my mind, haha). The only minor issue is that someone turning right off of Parker Rd will have to do a crazy backwards-right-turn according to the map. But as I understand it, most routing software will look at the overall shape (and roads nearby) to figure out what's really going on. Anyway maybe another more experienced mapper can chime in if they have a better way to do this!
Also nice job on the lane tags. :)

Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Since you requested a review, I looked over your changes here. Looks great overall! I see that you removed a bridge area feature (north end of Venture Parkway) - Was that intentional?

Thanks for your contributions!

Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Since you requested a review, I looked over your changes here. Everything seems great to me, thanks for your contributions!

Howdy! Since you requested a review, I looked over your changes here. Everything looks great here, thanks for your contributions!

Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Since you requested a review, I looked over your changes here. Looks great! The tags you ended up on (addr only) are perfect for this situation. Thanks for your contributions!

Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Since you requested a review, I looked over your changes here. Looks great over all! Here are a couple of suggestions/issues.
- The name tag is only for the common or official name of something, and shouldn't be used to describe a feature. In this case, the fact that this is a pavilion structure should be represented by other tags.
- Looks like you set layer=-1 to get rid of the warning about it crossing the foot path. Since it's a roof structure that goes over, it should be layer=1.
Overall, I suggest the following tags for this:

amenity=shelter
building=roof
shelter_type=picnic_shelter
layer=1

Let me know if you have any questions, and thanks for your contribution!

Sorry, got a little carried away with this one! Haha

Hello again! Looking over this changeset, there is an issue - you've moved the corner of this "open space" feature to overlap with some houses. Do you mind fixing that? Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks!