Hi, have you been to this location? These bleachers aren't a building. They just provide seating.

It's starting to seem like users should need to be whitelisted or something before being able to post comments or diary entries with links...

Do you know what the right way to specify the parking lot as being an "inner" area of the larger scrub multipolygon? I know how when the inner is all one way, but not sure when it's split up like you've done.

Hi, and welcome to OSM! Here are a few tips to work better with the community:
- Add a changeset comment so that others know what you changed.
- Save, upload, etc. your changes in one area before moving on to another.
- It looks like a few of these are duplicates of existing nodes. Be sure to check for existing data before adding new stuff on top.
Again, welcome, and thanks for your contributions!

Hi, and welcome again to OpenStreetMap! Your edits look good overall, but since you've asked for review, here are a couple of tips:
- It's best to avoid overlapping buildings and parking lots. Feel free to improve/adjust the building outlines as necessary to prevent this. More accuracy is always better.
- In the iD (online) editor, you can press "Q" to make shapes square.
- It looks like you've added a couple of commercial landuse areas to try and indicate "holes" in parking lots. A better way to do this is to draw the hole outline, then select both that and the outer parking lot, and press "C" to combine them into a multipolygon relation. Let me know if you want more info or explanation on how these work.

As always, thanks for your contributions!

Also, welcome to OSM!! :)

Just a tip, when drawing rectangular features in iD you can press "Q" to square up their corners. This makes them look much better when rendered.

Nice, thanks!! And that makes sense for the stop number. I agree that it should be what's marked on the sign.

That bus stop path by the Family Life building is new enough to not be on some satellite imagery, or maybe they really did tear it out!? (right on the highway there)

For my own use of that ivm resource in the future, is there some way to know on there whether a road is publicly accessible or private access only? Or maybe local knowledge, street-level images, etc. are required too like you say...

Got it. Thanks for the detailed explanation! I had no idea such huge swaths of technically USFS-included land were privately owned. I knew there are some public rights-of-way through private chunks, but didn't know the scale of it.

Nice catch!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137792304

These are mostly on forest service land, right? I was under the impression that most FS land is at least accessible by foot or horseback. Or does the pipeline have something to do with it?

Sorry for the duplicate questions. See my comment on your other changeset.

Gotcha, thanks for clarifying. I think that would be good to specify that somehow in the future, if you aren't already done bringing them in. Also, doesn't the lack of tags like fuel:octane_86 imply an "unknown" status without having to explicitly say it's unknown?

Do you have a link to this import discussion page? What's the source on this data?

What's the source for this import? Can you link to the required automated edit discussion page?

Oops, sorry for the huge bbox!! I normally put a lot of thought into preventing that from happening.

There is already a node for CAL Ranch here, but it's a shop=country_store. I think shop=clothing could make sense too though.

I've updated the instructions to include a QA step and a more specific list of changeset tags to use. https://github.com/lint3/cachevalley-address-import-osm#readme)