Xvtn's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 175606674 | 9 days ago | Good info! |
| 175606759 | 9 days ago | Hi, I've been reviewing some of your edits, and everything looks awesome! Thanks for your contributions! |
| 175783849 | 9 days ago | Hi, and welcome to OSM! Regarding "Removed unnecessary borders" - If I recall correctly, this WMA area was imported verbatim from the official source. That small exclusion you removed, as far as I know, is legitimate. Do you have any more info on this? Perhaps the actual boundary has indeed changed? |
| 170307984 | 4 months ago | Hey a heads up that the surface=fine_gravel vs surface=gravel situation is a little bit sticky in OSM. My understanding is that originally gravel meant more like fist-sized and larger stones, (not the way we Americans use that word) and fine_gravel is more what we typically mean when we say gravel. But, lots of people have been using gravel to mean any type of crushed-stone surface, so it's up in the air. Just wanted to let you know that possibly fine_gravel is a less ambiguous option for surface tags. Thanks for all your contributions! |
| 168616114 | 6 months ago | Hi, and thanks for your contributions. Another user Ezra Jenks has pointed out that some or all of these trails are still frequently (possibly illegally?) used by the public. However your private access tags remain in place. changeset/168677183
Let me know here if you have any questions or further input. |
| 168677183 | 6 months ago | You may consider using the access=permissive tag to designate this situation. But as the local it's up to you. |
| 167152932 | 6 months ago | Nice! Thanks! |
| 166176976 | 7 months ago | For this sled hill, you may consider piste:name or loc_name. But as the local mapper you have final say I think. :) |
| 166924064 | 7 months ago | Howdy! Thanks so much for all the improvements you've made to CV's bus features!! Out of curiosity, do you work for connect transit? I saw a while back you updated the HQ buildings and stuff.
|