OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
175606674 9 days ago

Good info!

175606759 9 days ago

Hi, I've been reviewing some of your edits, and everything looks awesome! Thanks for your contributions!

175783849 9 days ago

Hi, and welcome to OSM! Regarding "Removed unnecessary borders" - If I recall correctly, this WMA area was imported verbatim from the official source. That small exclusion you removed, as far as I know, is legitimate. Do you have any more info on this? Perhaps the actual boundary has indeed changed?

170307984 4 months ago

Hey a heads up that the surface=fine_gravel vs surface=gravel situation is a little bit sticky in OSM. My understanding is that originally gravel meant more like fist-sized and larger stones, (not the way we Americans use that word) and fine_gravel is more what we typically mean when we say gravel.

But, lots of people have been using gravel to mean any type of crushed-stone surface, so it's up in the air. Just wanted to let you know that possibly fine_gravel is a less ambiguous option for surface tags. Thanks for all your contributions!

168616114 6 months ago

Hi, and thanks for your contributions. Another user Ezra Jenks has pointed out that some or all of these trails are still frequently (possibly illegally?) used by the public. However your private access tags remain in place. changeset/168677183
I assume you represent the property owner - If you still allow public use despite this being private property, we also have the "permissive" access value to show that.
Also, thanks for not simply deleting these trails. Perhaps you are already aware, but there are myriad benefits to marking with appropriate access tags instead of deleting. osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

Let me know here if you have any questions or further input.

168677183 6 months ago

You may consider using the access=permissive tag to designate this situation. But as the local it's up to you.

167152932 6 months ago

Nice! Thanks!

166176976 7 months ago

For this sled hill, you may consider piste:name or loc_name. But as the local mapper you have final say I think. :)

166924064 7 months ago

Howdy! Thanks so much for all the improvements you've made to CV's bus features!! Out of curiosity, do you work for connect transit? I saw a while back you updated the HQ buildings and stuff.
Regardless, thanks again and happy mapping.