OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
135831833 over 2 years ago

Reverted.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135831833

135831833 over 2 years ago

Reverted.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135831833

135803347 over 2 years ago

"The names should be restricted to the name of the item in question only and should not include additional information not contained in the official name such as categories, types, descriptions, addresses, refs, or notes." —— osm.wiki/Names

132957781 almost 3 years ago

okay, I guess I have understood the criteria here, but not quite make sense to public

132957781 almost 3 years ago

I object to the opinion that motorway_link should be used in this Airport Road case. The main line of the road (i.e. Airport Road in this case) is not and should not be a link road by definition. The main line of motorway can be directly connected to a lower-level highway, a link road is not a prerequisite.

132957781 almost 3 years ago

Labeling a highway=motorway together with motorway=no seems to make no sense, especially after Route 8 ended and transferred to another road with a different name. It is okay to label the linking bridge with the mileposts of Route 8, which is exactly what I have edited. But it should not be used on Airpoty Road an Tung Wing Road. The situation of the main road is different from the link road.

132957781 almost 3 years ago

Please check Route 8 Expressway ended before the bridge connecting to Chek Lap Kok Island (with an expressway ending sign on the road), and Route 8 mileposts ended after the bridge. The [Airport Road], [Tung Wing Road] and [the bridge connecting North Lantau Highway and Airport Road] should not be highway=motorway!

121477229 almost 3 years ago

①②③并不是站名的一部分,如果阁下乘坐过西部公汽运营线路车辆,应该会听到形如“深大北门1号站台”的报站语音,把站台号放在name里并不是以后结构化的数据,只是一种偷懒的数据形式。当然,渲染没有带上站台号也是偷懒。

125033592 over 3 years ago

回复 qq-aaa: 你好,根据阁下提供的信息及本人掌握之情况,可以认为当前此跨海隧道仍处于规划中状态而并未实际开始建设,因此应使用highway=proposed而非highway=construction,详情请见https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway#Lifecycle_(see_also_lifecycle_prefixes) ,待工程开始建设之后再流转为建设中状态,本人将会执行此项编辑,请知悉。再次指出:已规划但未开工建设的道路请不要使用highway=construction,而应使用highway=proposed 感谢配合!(因url错误重新发送)

125033592 over 3 years ago

回复 qq-aaa: 你好,根据阁下提供的信息及本人掌握之情况,可以认为当前此跨海隧道仍处于规划中状态而并未实际开始建设,因此应使用highway=proposed而非highway=construction,详情请见https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway#Lifecycle_(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:see_also_lifecycle_prefixes),待工程开始建设之后再流转为建设中状态,本人将会执行此项编辑,请知悉。再次指出:已规划但未开工建设的道路请不要使用highway=construction,而应使用highway=proposed 感谢配合!

125033592 over 3 years ago

你好,阁下在此changeset中将深圳前海片区海滨大道前海至宝安段(隧道段)调整由此前的规划状态为在建状态是否由任何资料支持?若未在2022年9月1日前(10天)收到进一步的可信资料,本人将调整回规划中状态,若有后续资料支持,阁下可以另开changeset。同时,我将对此changeset中海滨大道之临海大道至梦海大道段错误的construction标记进行即时修正,请知悉。

119167061 over 3 years ago

Hi Misha, its form is really misleading so don't worry about that. Maybe I can add some notes to it.

119167061 over 3 years ago

深圳地铁前海车辆段 is a subway depot building above ground, please do not remove the building label. :)

116171224 almost 4 years ago

根据Key:place,suburb在OSM里定义为town或city里的一个主要区域,可能没有很明确的界限,也可能与其他suburb有重叠,suburb里的区域用quarter/neighbourhood来标注。那以华侨城为例,华侨城是沙河街道(i.e. town)中的一个主要区域,虽然名义上是景区,但实际上是包含众多住宅小区,医院,学校,公园的片区,又涵盖多个社区(i.e. quarter, refer to /wiki/China/Boundaries),非常符合这个定义,顾较为适宜以suburb标注此类地名。

100618088 almost 5 years ago

感谢您的编辑贡献,但本次编辑添加的深圳地铁12号线要素为仍不存的,希望可以请您删除,待线路开工建设后再行添加,如果您不清楚如何操作或有更多疑问可在此评论或私信本人。
Thank you for your contribution. However, this changeset is about features that are still not in the real world. Could you please remove the features of Shenzhen metro line 12 until construction starts? If you don't know how to do this or have any further questions, please comment here or feel free to contact me via message.

100618088 almost 5 years ago

请不要添加现实中仍不存在的地图要素,建设中的要素可以参考construction=*#Railways,谢谢

92538161 about 5 years ago

Thank you for your comment. If I have time, I will do so.

82341593 almost 6 years ago

The deletion of separate lanes causes some roads disconnected to what they originally connected.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82341593

80664723 almost 6 years ago

I am sorry that I was planning to mark it as commercial but wrongly marked as construction. Thank you for pointing out and I have fixed.

63411810 about 7 years ago

It is weird and inappropriate delete names for identification propose of an entity that has different appellations