Hi Keegan,

You seem to be using park tagging to a lot of places that it doesn't really belong (such as in this case where you added it to a building).

Have you checked out the OSM wiki yet? There's a lot of great information about tagging standards there

This is the OSM wiki page for leisure=park:
leisure=park

Hi mwilkinsonz

Welcome to OSM!

The feature you added is already on the map, here: way/182055817

Please feel free to reach out if you have any questions.

Hi speakerleader,
Welcome to OSM. This hospital is already on the map, I'm not sure what you were trying to add with the overlapping industrial and commercial areas.

Hi endyiscool,
You've changed this road into a power line - this is obvious an incorrect change, so I am going to revert this changeset.

Hi Glanzone,

You created a second, smaller park inside Welton's Gorge Park - what is this supposed to represent?

Hi!
You've added way/1034648283 as a park - it looks like some kind of structure? Maybe a covered pavilion or some kind of sports pitch? I'm not sure if park would be the best way to describe it.

Hi Miniya Burgess,

You added a tennis court as a park in this changeset - is this privately owned and associated with this big house next to it?

Hi Sam,

You added a park in this changeset. This is a private yard, so that tag isn't accurate. I can't see the pool you were trying to add.

I have removed the park.

Hi Tim,

I'm not especially familiar with the features you're adding, but at a guess based on the names and imagery, these might be better mapped as nature reserves or protected areas as opposed to parks?

Park tagging on OSM typically implies a maintained public green space.

leisure=park

leisure=nature_reserve

boundary=protected_area

Hi Andy,
The buildings and footpath you added here really don't appear to match any imagery.
There's clearly some development going on here, but even then, the buildings you added don't match the individual plots that appear in Esri Imagery and the footpath you added makes no sense at all.
Are you about to provide more information on what you used to trace these features?

Hi Brian,

I'm not sure if leisure=park is the best tag for this... it's not really an open maintained green space.

Maybe something like natural=bay would be a better fit, but I'm not 100% certain what you're trying to represent here?

Hi Spaghetti Monster,
Thanks for the feedback.
In this case, I wasn't sure if Aubrey’s Room was associated with the photography studio in the same building.
I normally allow 24 hours for a response and then remove the offending addition, but this one somehow slipped off my radar.
Cheers for following it up.

Some of the features you have added here clearly don't exist and have been removed.

Hi Sukhadad,

You changed this building: way/650952014 into a park, but there's already a larger park here: way/499397018

What were you trying to do?

Great work, thank you!

Hi,
I think you missed an "S" from the school name here
I'd fix it, but iD is throwing a whole heap of school operator related validation issues at me and I'm not sure the best way to resolve them

Hi,
You changed the tennis courts (way/686746464#map=18/36.56923/-121.94389) around this area into buildings - are those edits correct?

In this changeset you added a number of parks over buildings, including what appears to be your house.

Please do not add fictional features to OSM, the will be removed.

Hiya Greg,
Is Marge & Neal's Garden a private garden owned by people called Marge & Neal? If so, we typically shouldn't include private ownership information like that on OSM.

osm.wiki/Limitations_on_mapping_private_information

Actually - never mind, looking at the latest Maxar satellite Imagery, it seems like you've added this over houses. Please do not add fictional features to OSM, they will be removed.