WoodWoseWulf's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 86294151 | over 5 years ago | Hi gobearsberkeley, Thanks for the article, however it doesn't seem to mention the parks you added, or their adjacent streets. "Areas up for consideration in the program include several blocks of Broadway spanning El Camino Real to Main Street and the section of Main Street between Broadway and Middlefield Road. The project as presented would leave three cross Streets of Broadway open including Winslow Street, Hamilton Street and Jefferson Avenue. " This would put the changes more towards the city center. Searches for "Cleveland Urban Park" and "Fulton Urban Park" also reveal nothing - no reported council business, no newspaper articles, no references to development or legislative applications. |
| 86294566 | over 5 years ago | bollard* |
| 86294151 | over 5 years ago | Hi gobearsberkeley, These parks have been added by new mappers before and subsequently flagged as fictional and private front yards Do you have any evidence these exist?
|
| 86266896 | over 5 years ago | This actually reverts changeset #86266768, but for the same reason. |
| 86227040 | over 5 years ago | Previously, the account "ProfessorOak" (user:8081423) has added fictional parks in this general area, including two almost identical parks over this same building.
|
| 86214052 | over 5 years ago | Hello ProfessorOak,
|
| 71127918 | over 5 years ago | Aaaaannnd all 527 nodes have been (poorly) reverted back into existence in changeset/86143199 ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ |
| 85965851 | over 5 years ago | Hi Pitner,
leisure=park
landuse=residential
|
| 85965851 | over 5 years ago | Hi Pitner,
|
| 85955848 | over 5 years ago | If these areas have sports courts and other features, they need to be added separately. If you continue to add fictional features, they will be removed and you will be reported to the DWG. |
| 85906114 | over 5 years ago | Hi msbshow, You seem to be adding park tagging to a lot of things that aren't parks. Two things I've noticed in this changeset at the moose lodge, the resort and the volley ball court. There are other tags you can use to describe those kinds of features. You can read more about park tagging on the OSM wiki: leisure=park The wiki is a great resource if you're ever wondering how to tag something. |
| 85909894 | over 5 years ago | Hiya,
|
| 85671371 | over 5 years ago | (please excuse that random "f" I pressed comment to quickly) And secondly, please be careful adding personal information to the map. Who owns a path or a private house shouldn't be added to the map. Additionally, there are limits to what you should add to private property, you can read more here: osm.wiki/Limitations_on_mapping_private_information. |
| 85671371 | over 5 years ago | Hi Bradlee, Welcome to OSM and thanks for your recent additions! Just some comments on your recent changes: f Firstly the yard surrounding a house is not a park. OSM defines parks in a specific way, you can read more here: leisure=park. If you want to map grassed areas, there are other tags you can use, such as landuse=grass or landuse=meadow depending on their application. |
| 85514849 | over 5 years ago | Hi Tomahawk414! Welcome to OSM and thanks for your recent additions! Have you checked out the OSM wiki yet? It's a great guide on how to use different tags to describe things. I've noticed you've used some tags a little bit incorrectly in your changes- some of those incorrect usages include "natural=grassland" on tennis courts and park areas (when it comes to grassland, think plains of natural, unmaintained wild grass) and also "landuse=greenfield" which implies natural land slated for development. You can find the wiki here: osm.wiki/Main_Page |
| 85503903 | over 5 years ago | Hi Pitner,
|
| 85412505 | over 5 years ago | Hi Bubslecubs, Welcome to OSM and thanks for your first edit! Gardner Village is already on the map, here: way/720274212 Generally, we operate on a rule of "one feature, one OSM element", you can read more here: osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element |
| 85128555 | over 5 years ago | Hi weijielim, Welcome to OSM and thank you for your contribution! Are you sure leisure=park is the best tag for this area? At a glance, it looks like natural=wood may be a better fit. |
| 85099970 | over 5 years ago | Hi Jared, Welcome to OSM! In this edit, you pulled one of the nodes in the adjacent parking lot into the park you added. Now the two features intersect each other. I also can't find any information that verifies your edit - what is your source? The buildings and park don't appear on Bing Aerial Imagery (which your changeset lists as the imagery you used) and I've been unable to find any reference to a Sherman Park in Johnson City. Some of your other changesets also have comments, so you might want to check those out. Please reach out if you need any help! |
| 84453210 | over 5 years ago | Thanks Warin, you're the M.V.P. |