OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
64748403 about 7 years ago

Hi!
You added the street name to a private driveway in this edit. Are you happy to remove it?

64424714 about 7 years ago

Whoops, that comment was intended for note #1342528

64424714 about 7 years ago

Resolved in changeset #64424714

64065653 about 7 years ago

uhh, lifestyle=lifecycle :S

45705112 about 7 years ago

Doh! Thanks, I changed the tag.

62936812 over 7 years ago

It looks like you've joined the node for North Turrumurra Recreational Area into a footpath here by accident.

62936150 over 7 years ago

I've removed the duplicate area added in this edit - this park is already mapped.

62936551 over 7 years ago

Hi, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your recent contributions. I've noticed some of them already have comments so make sure you check out the feedback you've gotten.

On this edit (and all others) make sure you hit up the OSM wiki - in this case, particularly this page: osm.wiki/Names

It's best to avoid abbreviations, so instead of NTRA, you should use North Turramurra Recreation Area.

62210274 over 7 years ago

More questions on this edit:
You've marked paths, one way is clearly an unmaintained track road. I'd half pass it as a service road with surface=grass as you've mapped it, but the path you've marked separately alongside it clearly doesn't exist and runs through grave sites. Additionally, other paths you added appear to follow the curbing on the side of the roads and also don't look like they exist. Did you survey this location or are you very familiar with it? If not, what imagery/data source did you use?

62210274 over 7 years ago

paths *and* service roads***

62210274 over 7 years ago

Names like "Randwick Cemetery Service Road" or "Randwick Cemetery Path" are not correct - surely these paths are service roads are not all sign posted or even called this. Name= should be reserved for names only, not descriptions or anything else.

62157986 over 7 years ago

Okay, I'll bite... what do you mean by "hand of god" in every one of your change sets? It sometimes makes it difficult to track what you are doing, haha.

61858642 over 7 years ago

No problem :) Also, welcome to OSM! It's good to see another active mapper on the Coast. There aren't many of us and there's still so much to do!

61858642 over 7 years ago

Hey! Just some feedback on this edit: When you add retail buildings you should try to use building=retail (retail building) as opposed to landuse=retail (retail area - this applies to the land the retail building or collection of retail buildings sits on).

Also, the name=x tag should be reserved for actual names of places as opposed to descriptions, so "Westfield Tuggerah" would be a name= tag , but if it didn't have a name, using the name tag "name=Tuggerah Shops" being used as a descriptor would be incorrect for that same building.

61809771 over 7 years ago

Looks good to me so far - looks like you're working on it still, but you're doing well :)

61247022 over 7 years ago

Whoops - wrong changeset :S

61220408 over 7 years ago

Hi, I think you're looking for driveways rather than footpaths in this case:
service=driveway

61247022 over 7 years ago

Hi, I think you're looking for driveways rather than footpaths in this case:
service=driveway

61110259 over 7 years ago

The reason these paths were mapped is because they alternate from one side of the road to the other, with some parts of the street missing paths all together. This is a particularly dangerous street that sees a lot of heavy vehicle traffic where pedestrian routing is useful.

Additionally, you have not replaced the paths with anything to indicate what side of the road has a foot path.

Please re-read the OSM best practice and also the OSM wiki page on sidewalks under the header "sidewalks as a seperate way".

Please do not remove other people's work without consulting them or at the very least improving the map.

60970091 over 7 years ago

multiple *houses* inside