Yer.. I'd not worry about a relation for the rock areas. Just map each rock area with the name=The Tanks .. and maybe a website link to https://barringtoncoast.com.au/directory/the-tanks
...
I'd not be worried about the swimming aspect ... possibly dangerous at certain tides?

Hi,

Thanks for adding this detail into OSM.

However the area is also covered by Way: 135196663 .. so the rocks with be covered by tree symbols.. See way/135196663 Note that it is also tagged 'landuse=conservation' .. but I think it is more park than conservation. In any case the OSM guide is 'one feature=one OSM entry' so the trees should be split from the other feature (whatever it is). I take it your local so may know if it is signed as a park?

Hi,

What are 'The Tanks'???
It is not clear from imagery .. and 'swimming pool' does not look appropriate?

The relation .. has no outer way .. so that does not work. Think both ways should be 'outer' .. but the tags still do not explain what they are...

Humm web search suggest these are rock formations .. so 'natural=bear_rock' ... then tag the sea between them and the shore with a node 'leisure=swimming_pool' ???

Hi,

The National Park looks like it incorporated parts of a state forests?? Does the National Park coexist with the state forest or has the state forest beed reduced by the National Park taking some of it away???
way/686125986#map=15/-34.4407/116.2668

Yer .. found rugby in the local press .. so I added that and cricket..
Thanks for the reply.

\Hi,

Note these are not personal criticisms but information about OSM tagging and mapping to help improve your mapping.

Hi,

What kind of 'football' is played here?

The 'Catherine Field Baseball Park' ... looks to be named 'Les Tegal Oval' on the DCS Base map???

I have removed the name 'Catherine Field Park Cricket Nets' and corrected the sport tag to sport=cricket_nets'.

Hi,
The 'name' tag is for names only - not 'descriptions' such as tennis court etc.

Hi,
notes are used to alert other mappers to problems ... not to describe the feature.
These 'notes' have all been changed to 'description'...

Hi
This one changeset has heath and bear rock in the one location, it cannot be both ... see
way/1136351103#map=19/-35.60373/149.11648
way/1136351104

In another changeset that is also another conflict see
way/1136351105

Hi,
This edit has caused way 877757159 (park) to cross itself...
see https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=116.01023&lat=-31.97233&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

Hi
way/1136484941 is in error... you do repeat this error from time to time.. why?

See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=115.86166&lat=-32.01328&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

This looks like 4 separate houses - look at the entry ways.

Hi,

The name tag is for names only, not descriptions. See osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only

Hi,

The DCS Base Map (should be available with your editor) has the present day boundaries ... they include the boundary for the road... take a look.

The DCS base map says no wet land in this area at all.
Additionally there are several areas that are not grass that are within the relation but not members... meaning there is some work to do on the relation.

Hi,
Welcome to OSM!

There is an error with the relation created here. The outer ways cross one another and that is the 'error'.
So ... why create the two ways? Is there something different between the two parts of the building?

Next question? Why is there the tag 'layer=1' on this building? Does all of it go over something?

Hi,

Advice...
The fire station building is not named .. it is the amenity (area) that carries the name..
Read building=fire_station

Hi,

Some hints?
A 'building=roof' would also be tagged as being higher that the road it covers so 'layer=1" could be an appropriate additional tag.

A multipolygon's outer ways cannot share segments. So a 'roof' over an entrance is probably best left off the main building, makes very little difference to the map and is easier to map.

Hi,
The relation/15360493 has "shared segments"... 2 inners cross one another.. a heath and a wet land .. is it really both??? Ways 1134878250 and 1134878253.