Hi,
Just noticed this... nit picking but ...
The 'farmyard' way/173909018 is a land use - not the legal boundaries but the use to which the land is put. And talking about that - some of this area is for land use residential ... human swimming pools are not part of farm yards.
The other point it that the present mapping shows the area covered by trees. This can be corrected by making 'inners' in the tree relation.

The NAME of the shop is not 'Snow Gear and Equipment'.
See osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only

Hi
relation/13555927 is not closed (landuse=farmland)

See relation/13555927#map=16/-34.5526/146.0056 and https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=146.00382&lat=-34.55385&zoom=15

Hi,

These beach 'names' look to be 'descriptions'?

See
osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
description=*

Also .. I would add the tag 'surface=sand' to these beaches. See natural=beach

Oh.. the over lay beach is

way/1007169299#map=17/-37.78032/148.96874

I have removed the offending way.

The entry of the beach 'Tamboon - Sydenham Inlet'/Tamboon Inlet' over lays a past entry of the beach 'bemm river'.

All these 'names' look to me to be 'descriptions' ...
See osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only

And description=*

Hi,

What is the source of the beach name 'Tamboon - Sydenham Inlet'?

Hi,

The 'name' of the beach looks to be a creek name. What is the source of the beach name?

A reminder of my past comment .. the beach could have a surface of rock or mud. See natural=beach ... I suggest using the tag surface=sand.

Hi,

There is an error in the method used to map these 2 buildings - see https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=142.47957&lat=-38.37850&zoom=18

For way/1012329935 they should be 3 separate ways as they are 3 separate buildings.

For way/1012329933 ... I make it 7, yes 7 separate buildings.

Consider using other imagery ... Mapbox looks clearer here compared to Bing.

One tip: square up the buildings using the key 'Q'.

.

This change set changed the named "South Island' tagged as an island later an islet that applied to both the tree area and the sand area

to

being only the sand area. This is not correct.

I have made a new relation for the sand area ... natural=beach, surface=sand .... And then restored the island/islet to be the whole tree area and sand area.

Similar has been done for the other Cocoss Islands... If you have done similar elsewhere would you please correct those?

.

.

.

.

.

?
intermittent ...
"The rainfall in Daylesford is significant, with precipitation even during the driest month. "
"Precipitation here is about 617 mm | 24.3 inch per year."

Does not sound like a place where water ways could be tagged intermittent?

What is the source of this population data?

What is the source of this data?

I note that the kontur popultion webpage https://www.kontur.io/portfolio/population-dataset/ states "publicly available global population dataset by obtaining and processing all available data". Available data may come from copyright webpages .. and that is not suitable for entry into OSM.

The source statement in this changeset does not state the source of the population data .. which is the sole thing you changed?

Hi,
relation/8764842 - fairway - now has no outer ... but 2 inners.