Warin61's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 112784574 | about 4 years ago | Too much practice. I have been mucking about them them in NSW for ages, fairly sick of them.
|
| 113322268 | about 4 years ago | Hi,
I have also removed the 1 member relation for Bira Lake Reserve and placed the tags on what was the outer way. This reduces the complexity. |
| 113254464 | about 4 years ago | Yes, it is a problem. See how you have the water? A separate way that does not touch the outer? That is how I'd do the house area. See osm.wiki/Relation:multipolygon#Multipolygon_created_by_only_one_polygon for an example.. |
| 113308993 | about 4 years ago | Hi,
What is the source of the areas mapped as 'Reserves'? |
| 113254464 | about 4 years ago | Hi,
The outer way touches it self .. see https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=149.07852&lat=-35.06342&zoom=17 It would be better to have the homestead area as a separate way (landuse=residential?) as an inner for the landuse=meadow. Extra points? The homestead could be mapped building=farm. The DCS NSW Base Map shows its name as Tatibah. |
| 113014301 | about 4 years ago | Hi,
Open the relation for editing, and then go to the first gap. Down relief (62 nodes). Right click and zoom to that way. Scroll down to the last way in the next group of ways - they have another break at the end. Select that last way by double clicking on it.. the red way that was selected will vanish and another way will go red .. but it is not on this screen. OK - that means this group of ways is not the group to change.
Shit them up the order - use the blue arrow up button to move the group up ... as you move up the gap will remain up until it all falls in to order. Ok - good .. that bit is done. But there can be more so check for the next gap.. and there is another ... repeat the above .. but this time only one group needs to be reordered. Similar things will need to be done for the other relations. --------------------
|
| 113015222 | about 4 years ago | Hi,
See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=145.34425&lat=-38.03243&zoom=18 You should fix this. |
| 112768666 | about 4 years ago | Hi,
|
| 112768666 | about 4 years ago | I use JOPSM, never used Id. When I open the relation I see a list of members - it starts with the stations and then goes on to the ways.
When you edit these ways the relation needs to be checked, too easy not too .. I have not done it many times myself.. practice makes perfect as they say. |
| 112768666 | about 4 years ago | I take it your not going to fix your errors???? |
| 112768666 | about 4 years ago | Hi,
Note: These are version 2 relation and need the route to be in sequential order - start to finish. The tracks are still in ht eroute but the section you have altered is in the wrong order. |
| 112784574 | about 4 years ago | Hi, No rolls on ways in relation/13349345, corrected. Also had crossing ways ... corrected using bing that gives more detail detail to tree area. |
| 112201627 | about 4 years ago | The changset has:
So, I ask again: What is the source of the geometry? And the second question: Protected by who? Arr .. here we go .. a website tag would be good to https://www.dpaw.wa.gov.au/management/off-reserve-conservation/the-great-western-woodlands |
| 112201627 | about 4 years ago | Hi,
Tagged as 'protected area' .. protected by who/what??? What is the source of the geometry? This cannot be satellite imagery as it does not follow a natural tree/shrub/water line. Why a relation? |
| 112572419 | about 4 years ago | Hi
see https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=147.41643&lat=-36.51880&zoom=13 Leave it to you. |
| 112524248 | about 4 years ago | Hi,
I have changed this.
|
| 112526439 | about 4 years ago | I believe MapshareVic is NOT suitable for use in OSM.
I note that MapshareVic also states that some of the data is from other parties that may need to be contacted for their permission to use their data. In short do not use t MapshareVic data. Unless you have written permission to do you - in which case produce it. |
| 112526439 | about 4 years ago | 1) it is NOT possible to source this from the imagery stated.
|
| 112406297 | about 4 years ago | I am awaiting a response to the copyright issue - I have had one, but not on any changeset and on the subject of deletion of Fryers Ridge State Forest. |
| 112406297 | about 4 years ago | Nev - see changeset/112486478#map=12/-37.1502/144.2874
|