And another one
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=144.73441&lat=-38.33052&zoom=18

This error has not been fixed.

More relationship errors

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=144.86922&lat=-38.44625&zoom=18

No outer way on relation/13015608 - Harbour Esplanade.

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=145.03864&lat=-37.78672&zoom=16

Click on the blue/green lines to see the error.

Hi,

Welcome to OSM.

Administration boundaries (the PSMA sourced stuff) are not roads ... e.g.
Way 851954026 and way/851953079

Both have been tagged as roads .. these tags will be removed and the administration boundaries repaired.

Note: these administration boundaries are a problem for all of us, it is not just you.

man_made=silo

What is the source of your information for hole numbers?

There is NO grass here.

Hi,
There looks to be some errors on this Bowling Green Bay National Park ... the relation has 2 ways that almost cover the same area...
See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=147.25781&lat=-19.35365&zoom=10
The norther section has the 2 ways .. I have not looked at the southern error.

Hi
The parking relation/13019200 is incorrect.
The roll 'inner' has be assigned to the outermost way which should have the role 'outer'. And all the ways with the role 'outer' are inside and mark features that should be excluded from the parking - so they should have the roll 'inner'!

Hi,

Are all your bus stops sourced from ptv.vic.gov.au ?

The ptv.vic.gov.au is not a source that can be used in OSM. See osm.wiki/Australian_data_catalogue#Victoria

What is the source of adding golf=cartpath to these roads???

One of the water ways is off the golf area yet it is now tagged as a golf hazard. Why?

Hi,
Welcome to OSM!

I cannot see the sand bunker you have entered - Way: 966204342 - see way/966204342#map=19/-34.96340/138.52514

I have looked with Bing and Maxar Premium and .. err no. Looks to some rocks inside that area but no sand.

Can you explain?

Hi,

I take it the names for these new streams came from the NSW DCS Base Map? You will find the Base Map to be usefull where things are under tree cover.

Tag it disused if that is suitable. Maxar shows it very green while Bing shows it in use. My thinking is that the farmer may well use the track for harvesting, planting etc so it may become 'in use' once more. Some renders won't show disused - as in it vanishes, others render it differently.

Correction.
Norwest of Forbes. Not Parkes

I would think that the farmer uses these tracks to access the adjacent fields.
There is a mapped gate at the western end of Way: Banks Road (696650315). No mapped fence or gate at other locations.

A router should pay attention to the access tags, the access may not show on some maps. The problem of rendering should not impact the entry of data.

Rather than delete data - add to it. In this case add access=private. If you have evidence that the track is 'disused' then add the tags for that. Only remove things when they are well and truly gone.

HI,

The tag "access=private" can be used to say that a road is not open to the public - that is it is a private road.
The other problem is that the vic government has a name on at least one of these roads ..

Reverted and access tags added to tracks.

You have never been here? I have.

Pages Creek Rd is tertiary, certainly not service! The golf course does not run across this rd.

I have;
Reduce the size of the golf course, added access and description tags to it.
Tagged the road correctly.