Opps ...
By adding highway=tertiary to the Reni Bridge (destroyed) routers will now route traffic across this (destroyed) bridge.

Note the 'now' ...

By adding highway=tertiary to the Reni Bridge (destroyed) routers will not route traffic across this (destroyed) bridge.

Possibly best to use some life prefixes to both highway and bridge tags - disused: abandoned: raised: ???

Hi,

Could you spend some time repairing the mistakes you have made here? I am getting tired of repairing them.

See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=150.46428&lat=-34.44011&zoom=16

Reverted to correct errors.

No communication.

No attempt to repair damage done by this changeset.

Reverted in full.

Reverted.

Restore 3 buildings - still there according to the referred imagery. And undo combining things.

Hi,
Wlecome to OSM.

Some errors produced by this changeset : See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=150.46629&lat=-34.44062&zoom=16

Yes.

Hi,

I have changed a 'unclassified road' to track and another one to path. Could you please check here - I am far from local but another person has made some changes too - I am checking on them. I have also added some buildings.

See changeset/103945148

No GPS traces found in this area.

No meaningful changeset comment.

Unclassified Rd looks the same as track.

Changes made in Greenland have been at least partially reverted.

Suggest your changeset comments reflect what you are doing, and where you are doing it.

Where you change something that has a source tag .. either remove the source tag or change it to reflect the source.

Would not the coastline (Greenland) be after the ice flow?

No changeset comment.

Please read osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments.

Hi,

The multipolygon relation/2833302 is now in error following this changeset.

See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=174.73599&lat=-39.11920&zoom=9

Hi,

No need to excluded parks, schools, etc from residential landuse areas.

No need for apologies.
Id editor is not the best if your dealing with boundaries. Actually there is no 'great editor for boundaries'!

Just something to try and be aware of. I do try to alert people when I have 'corrected' their work in case my 'correction' damages their entries.

Hi,

Welcome to OSM.

Unfortunately this changeset broke the relations for;
Mt Maurice Reg Res.
Forester
Banca
Winnaleah

I have attempted a partial reversion of this changeset to restore these relations. This may have some effect on the data you have entered.

I go for simpler, much easier to understand. I have also separated the trees from the reserve, again - simpler.

Hi,

Welcome to OSM!

Previous mappers have not mapped the smaller middle bit near the pier as part of the reserve. Is it part of the reserve?

I have made the relation into a simple single closed way, this includes the middle bit.
And I have separated the tree areas from the nature reserve.

Oh, you could combine the outer ways into one way and remove the relation (if there are no inners).

Exception: if there are over 2,000 nodes, then make it as serparate ways. Multipolygon relations should also have less than 300 members... sometimes these exceptions need to be broken, but in general...

Segments cannot be shared when they are members of the same multipolygon relation.

Segments can be shared ... between;
2 (or more) separate ways
2 separate multiplication relations

-------------------
Do you mean tags or names?

If things are common to the outer ways of a multipolygon relation then those things should be on/in hte relation. Only put things that are different between the outer ways on the outer ways.