Warin61's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 97627401 | almost 5 years ago | Short answer: I don't know. Long answer: has been discussed internationally (we not the only ones with this problem), there have been some interesting ideas .. but no forward progress. Do take a look at the DCS Base Map .. has clifts and possibly hi water mapped.. I am going to raise it on the Aus talk list and see what they say... these boundaries look to me like they are the low water mark so separate from what your editing anyway... I have corrected them where they are generating faults but would like wider feedback. |
| 97627401 | almost 5 years ago | Hi,
|
| 97556767 | almost 5 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OSM. The Tumut Bowling club relation... Umm not good. No need to include things inside the outer most boundary.
Relations are one of the harder things in OSM. |
| 94139008 | almost 5 years ago | relation/11894410 ... only one member and tagged as an inner.. You are not so far responding to comments... ??? |
| 93763469 | almost 5 years ago | 25 days and still not fixed? Suggest you use https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=151.78544&lat=-32.92980&zoom=18 to keep an eye out for your mistakes. It is what I do... |
| 97522446 | almost 5 years ago | Hi, There are some 'duplicated nodes' here. See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=145.28236&lat=-38.07220&zoom=17. Also some areas (e.g. grass) that overlap over areas (e.g. sand). Try to edit one area (hole) at a time?
I have done some work on one of the holes just east of the 18th hole. I'll leave the rest to you. |
| 97431021 | almost 5 years ago | Hi,
|
| 97520465 | almost 5 years ago | Opps.. typo. |
| 97335824 | almost 5 years ago | Boundary relations have 'roles' ... you have not assigned some of these.
I have fixed the following 2 relations - Bar Beach and Merewether |
| 93688492 | almost 5 years ago | Hi,
|
| 95906055 | almost 5 years ago | Hi
|
| 93955489 | almost 5 years ago | One member relations are not required, use tags on the simple way .. don't make it complex when you don't have too. e.g Relation: 11863114 |
| 96755212 | almost 5 years ago | HI,
|
| 97197278 | almost 5 years ago | Kurraha Ridge (893580450, v1) is NOT a farmyard. Suggest this be changed to map the building with building=farm. Roads leading to this homestead are NOT tertiary nor do they appear paved. highway=service, service=driveway would be more correct. Access=private does not need tags of *=private added to it. |
| 96792258 | almost 5 years ago | Hi,
The building=* is for the building only, not the building + grounds. ----------------------
Please edit these building so that they are the building footprint only. |
| 92335829 | almost 5 years ago | Hi,
See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=145.45605&lat=-30.87017&zoom=6 |
| 93780861 | almost 5 years ago | Deleted.
|
| 96629214 | almost 5 years ago | An alternative is to use a site relation - that does not confine to a simple area. |
| 96637174 | almost 5 years ago | Try a site relation?
|
| 45478783 | almost 5 years ago | Deleted 'park'. Deleted name=Trees. Name should be for name ONLY. |