Also conflates boundary with NP boundary.

natural=wood is for a tree area, Some bits of these may not have trees. So I would not use this.

I'll retag them as leisure=nature_reserve, not certain of their protection status. They are clearly shown on the LPI/DCS base map. I would like them identified as being 'public land' so that anyone trying to deny use of it is know to be wrong.

Hi,

There is an error on one building.

Firstly Relation: 11991963 "type"="multipolygon" "building"="house"
has only one member and that relation can be deleted.

Second Relation: 11991964 "type"="multipolygon" "roof:colour"="#F2EEE7" "building"="house"

referred to the above relation .. but with no role. Instead the outer way for this building should be referred to with the role 'outer'.

Hi,
Relation: 11863112 "landuse"="grass" "type"="multipolygon"

has only one member and that member has the same tags... suggest you delete it.

Note I find these errors using https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=151.75568&lat=-32.94248&zoom=12

Hi,

Relation: 11884302 "highway"="pedestrian" "type"="multipolygon"

has only one member - an inner. Suggest you delete it.

Hi,

This looks like you are saving a copy of your changes to a local disk. The problem is that the save is before the upload to OSM, as such the local data has flags that says it is not uploaded. When you upload again follow some change the data that was uploaded is uploaded again creating a duplication. So far there are 3 instances of rooms, lifts and stairs.

If you are saving locally (I do it too) please save after you upload to OSM so the present 'loaded' status is saved.

You may find JOSM to be a better editor for what you are doing... it certainly picks up more errors such as duplicated features, and self intersecting ways.

Hi,
Welcome to OSM...

Name are not usually all caps.

The name tag should ONLY be used for names , not descriptions nor for things that should be obvious from other tags e.g. stairs, lifts... See osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only

The 'name' 'PRIVATE ROOM #' looks to be more of a description or reference .. please see the OSM wiki for the tags description and reference...

Yep. The memory fades over time. I'll remove the name as it does not appear on the presently available sources.
Good luck with the new mapping.

Admin boundaries not closed...

See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=148.93322&lat=-35.73180&zoom=10

Are we allowed to use that source?

Base map will give you bridges - solid lines either side of road/track.

It is free form text. So no real rules, you can use whatever you like. As long ass the meaning is clear.

Six maps is NOT an approved source for use in OSM!!!! It is a commercial arm of LPI/DCS and should not be used in any way. Please use LPI/DCS.

Local government data usually includes copyright statements that are not compatible with use in OSM.

Hi,

The multipoygon relation for the industrial building is not correct.

The inside area should have a simple way .. with the role 'inner' fro the relation. Then the outside of the building should have a way, or a number of ways that form a continuous loop. See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=150.84930&lat=-33.75930&zoom=17

However ... looking at it .. these are two separate buildings .. with 2 covered connections between them. I'd tag each building separately. Then add the walkways as separate 'buildings'. This would allow each to have different heights, colours etc.

Hi,
When you add land cover 'holes' in areas already mapped with another land cover it gets confusing.
In this case the land cover of wetlands (a relation) and water need to be added to a land cover relation of trees Relation: 3550886.
In this case I have done it for you.

The error for this relation continues to exist.

Hi,
Where did you get that these areas are part of 'St Helena Village'? Survey?

Hi,

This changeset added areas to the relation of 'St Helena Village'. Where did you get the information that thesse areas are part of 'St Helena Village'?

Arr.. now it is clear. At the time I put that website link on the site was named "Crosslands Reserve" so I put the link on... later another mapper has changed the name ... but left the link on. I'll remove it.

I'll also place the name and website on the camp ground a little way north ... + a few other details.