relation/11661078 - residential area does not need to be a relation. And it has an error - see https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=151.75714&lat=-32.91143&zoom=15.

I would delete the relation - leaving the ways. then tag the ways are residential areas.

Hi
relation/11059727 has touching outer members. This causes problems - see https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=149.20479&lat=-35.34921&zoom=13.

Don't see any reason why the outers are all part of the relation, if they are sim[p[le areas then they can be tagged on the ways alone. Think there is only one with inners that then needs to be in the relation.

Note! Maxar imagery also used in this change set for the most recent information.

Hi,
Welcome to OSM!

The relation for building=house rel_id: 11562066 is not quite correct. The outer way way_id: 842499113 has the same tags as the relation. Remove the tags from hte outerway. Reason: the outer way would have all of the area as a building where as the relation has a hole in it.

A small improvement in mapping 'square' things (made of right angles) is to press the q key when the object is highlighted. This should 'square' all the corners making it look better.

Hi,

OSM is not the place to add phantom data.
Various of your entries have been removed as they do not exist. Please only add things that are there.

No response. Deleted.

Suggestion:
Delete the relation and its ways.

Make a new way for the residential area.

Hi,
way/846975535 (building) has a problem...
see https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=149.58123&lat=-33.42055&zoom=18

I was trying to indicate that the landuse is forestry ... rather than simply trees as is assumed by some from the tag landuse=forest. I did this on nodes (not ways) with the tag landuse=forestry.
There are 2 NSW Forestry Corporation areas that are not tree production areas, one is a sawmill the other PR.
Note: I now have OSMand render landuse=forest different from natural=wood so these areas are now quite evident to me with that app. It is not my 'best choice' for rendering it but it will do until I find another way.

Hi,

The relation does not from a closed area.
See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=147.91396&lat=-42.58331&zoom=13

Hi,
For Tuckwell Park sports .. I take it soccer is no longer played here in winter? The tagging for it was removed in this changeset.

Hi
The building name "house" is not a name but a description.
Name should be names ONLY. See osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only

Deleted.

Hi,
The changeset comment should describe what has been done.
For this changeset it looks like "align unnamed secondary highway".
It would be good to have a true name for this highway (not a description).

Hi,
This church does not appear to exist.

And has been deleted, as have all the other entries in this changeset.

Please do not add phantom things to OSM.

Hi,
relation/11559757 (residential) is not closed.

This could be a simple closed way instead of a relation. In any event it needs fixing.

Hi,
Welcome to OSM.
A number of small errors in your entries, just need a little fixing.
See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=115.98763&lat=-31.98047&zoom=13
For instance Way: Kewdale Industrial Area (742768435) ... this doubles back on itself causing the area to crossover itself. Looking on the imagery it does not look to be this entire area so I would remove the tail bit to the north east and what looks like scrub rectangle also in the north east.
The tag of warehouse does not look to apply to the entire area ... some of it looks to be a car park?

Keep mapping, try to fix these errors .. if you need help you can ask here or elsewhere.

Still not fixed.

Hi,

Relation outer ways cannot share segments .. sorry but that is not on. See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=146.79639&lat=-19.29211&zoom=18

Humm how about a simple way - map the extent of the property - fence lines to foot path and tag that as the motel? You already have the buildings etc.

No comment.
No source.

And creating errors! Not the way to make a hole in a way, a multipoygon relation must be used. For the error see https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=144.28337&lat=-36.80089&zoom=15

For the way to fix it see osm.wiki/Relation:multipolygon.
I expect you to fix the error.