OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
81930884 over 5 years ago

Hi,
OpenTopmap looks to be incompatible for use within OSM. Specifically the STRM data is for private use only, the OpenTopoMap is CC-BY-SA.

As you have failed to respond to my previous comment I am tempted to simply revert all your change sets with OpenTopoMap listed as a source.

85001393 over 5 years ago

Hi,
Administrative boundaries cannot be found on satellite imagery.
Please state the source of these administrative boundaries.
--------------------------------
你好
在衛星圖像上找不到管理邊界。
請說明這些管理界限的來源。

28643542 over 5 years ago

Hi,

These are tagged with source:name=* .. but there is no name=*. Possibly better as source:building=*???

53966601 over 5 years ago

In the middle of the street?
Deleted. There are blubbers already mapped to the north east and south west.

85354888 over 5 years ago

Hi,

highway=path are not supposed to be wide enough to take a motor car. Usually assumed motorvehicle=no, just as a footpath is assumed to be motorvehicle=no.

82126608 over 5 years ago

Reverted.

82146995 over 5 years ago

Reverted.

65883024 over 5 years ago

Hi
I believe wikipedia copyright is not compatible with OSM.

82147976 over 5 years ago

Reverted

82147725 over 5 years ago

Reverted

85223123 over 5 years ago

Hi,
Two problems with this change set.
relation/11101137 - scrub has duplicate segments.

relation/11101134 has a member whose role should be inner.

See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=117.08008&lat=-33.66698&zoom=12

84860653 over 5 years ago

Sorry .. link
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=147.18788&lat=-41.52896&zoom=18

way/801445623 doubles back on itself..

84860653 over 5 years ago

I would think you would be interested in fixing this error?

84189109 over 5 years ago

Thank you for confirming that you are getting notifications of changeset comments. Saves me from contacting the DWG. I note this also confirms you are ignoring my comments on errors.

You will note that the relation is not rendering so deleting it will have no effect on the rendered map, it simply removes it from the error report.
As it takes longer to make comment on your changesets in the hope that you will fix the error .. and you don't look to be doing that I will cease making the comments in your case as it is a waste of my time.
The fastest option for me is deletion without comment. The better option is for you to correct these minor errors. They can be found at the website that I have provided, daily refreshed ~8pm.

84761762 over 5 years ago

The link
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=146.88852&lat=-36.13901&zoom=18

highlights where duplicate segments occur in the relation/11073972.

These duplicate segments are an error for a single building.

To me that structure looks to be several individual buildings with 3 connecting walk ways. I would not use a relation at all, just tag the individual ways.

84189109 over 5 years ago

I have no interest in continuing to fix your errors.

Shall I simply delete than from now on?

85041366 over 5 years ago

As you don't seem to be interested in fixing your errors shall I simply delete the entries in error?

84548330 over 5 years ago

As you don't seem to be interested in repairing your errors shall I simply delete the entry in error?

84959016 over 5 years ago

Error on wood - way/791645085.

See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=153.10734&lat=-27.48594&zoom=14

84860653 over 5 years ago

Error on way/801445623.
See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=147.18734&lat=-41.AC&zoom=18