OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
79697299 almost 6 years ago

Relations deleted! These are wrong in that the outer ways spare segments.

The ways have been combined in to one way with the appropriate tags.

79699949 almost 6 years ago

Hi,
On building way/764178513 there is a strange node that is causing a problem.
See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=151.10581&lat=-34.11949&zoom=10

If the node is deleted then I think things will be fine.

PS the source description of 'aerial' could be may things .. pleas be more specific .. usually in this area i use the LPI Imagery.

79095140 almost 6 years ago

way/760094996 .. repaired.

79561480 almost 6 years ago

relation/10559067 is an error! First .. it only has one member - so it is a simply way. Second it only has a role of inner ... there is no outer. Third relation/10033046 is what relation 10229067 should be. Deleted.

79531225 almost 6 years ago

Hi,

You changing the admin boundaries for the suburbs of Taylor and Jacka. What is the source of these administration boundaries changes? Note - it cannot be imagery.

79231381 almost 6 years ago

Shall I delete it? Or will you edit it?

79369302 almost 6 years ago

Hi,
Welcome to OSM.

Relations 10560365 and 10560366 are duplicate of each other.

Multipolygon relations are not easy.
One of the 'rules' is that their outer ways should not share segments. And these relations break that rule.

What to do?
Delete both relations.

Tag the ways with landuse=residential and your done. This is much simpler, and simpler is better.

38810762 almost 6 years ago

Looks to me like they have changed it to suit the present road. The 'old' easement may have been a previous road alignment.

78020394 almost 6 years ago

Hi,

What information does the route=power relation give? Would not the lines give you that information?

And what is ref=KTS-SBY1? And where does it come from+

79358937 almost 6 years ago

relation/10559576 is tagged as a multipolygon .. not as a route as it should be.

38810762 almost 6 years ago

Hi,

Just updating Sawyers hut .. when I noticed these boundaries look a little strange compared to the current Base map? There is not a consistent shift as you'd expect from the 1.8 meter 'adjustment' .. but something more than 6 meters .. and not in a consistent direction. An ideas as to what is going on?

79231381 almost 6 years ago

As Kawana Shopping World is a single building .. it does not need to be a multipolygon relation. Multipolygon relations outer ways cannot share segments - mean this one is in error.

This should be made into a single way.

78808859 almost 6 years ago

My tool of choice for undoing my own (it happens) ...
osm.wiki/JOSM/Plugins/Reverter

78808859 almost 6 years ago

All the things copied from that source need to be removed. They cannot be left in OSM. I suggest you cease other activities untill that is completed.

79193540 almost 6 years ago

Error

Duplicated nodes on way/760790510.

79176082 almost 6 years ago

And brake the Fadden and the Gowrie admin boundaries .. Could you please take care of these admin boundaries when you do your edits?

Fixed.

79095140 almost 6 years ago

Building crosses it self.. + others..
See
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=147.21387&lat=-31.88315&zoom=6

78808859 almost 6 years ago

Err
That looks to be copyright... and there looks to be no waiver.
See
https://apps.canterburymaps.govt.nz/canterburyMaps/TermsandConditions.pdf
https://ecan.govt.nz/info/copyright/
and
osm.wiki/New_Zealand_Data_Catalogue

As balcoath has failed to respond and is mapping I'll let the DWG know.

78808859 almost 6 years ago

Ummm
https://ecan.govt.nz/info/copyright/
Website visitors may reproduce, store and use the content of this website for personal, informational and non-commercial purposes only. Otherwise, no portion of the content of the website, including text, graphics, photos and the Council logo, may be copied or used without the written permission of the Council.

I don't see it on osm.wiki/New_Zealand_Data_Catalogue

So I think this is a copyright breach.

51956782 almost 6 years ago

Ok, your more local than me. I just found it strange when I can across it.