New relation deleted.
Old relation corrected.

Hi,
There is a node that connects the building to the road on the north wast corner. Remove the node from the building way and see what that does then.

The multipolygon relation/10435734 Gardener Reserve has duplicated segments.
See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=144.94397&lat=-37.79897&zoom=18

As the park does not share ways with anything else .. it may be better mapped as a single simple way.

See relation/6631546.

I now note that you have introduced a new relation for this forest. It is not good practice to delete things and replace them with a new thing, makes it harder to see the history within OSM of that feature.

And now it only has one member - not closed.
Nor is it a 'managed wood'.

Hi,
Problems with the Leach State Forest;

not really an administration thing?

the farm land way/446118161 tagged as an inner .. is not inside...

is it a landuse that produces timber? If so it may be better tagged as landuse=forest

No worries. When it is repetitive I let the mapper know, when it is a one off it is quicker to fix and get on with other things.

Still a duplicate node on this way. See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=144.66710&lat=-36.94723&zoom=15

There are over 8,000 uses of man_made=antenna. Only 5 uses of power=antenna_line.

These 'lines' are antennas. They would be more correctly tagged man_made=antenna.

Are these 'lines' actually antennas? Would they more correctly be tagged man_made=antenna?

Reverted as it broke the Hobart adim boundary (which I'll admit is an extremely badly mapped boundary!) I have tried to fix some errors here (one way going the wrong way!, overlapping ways ..)

Hi,
There is a duplicate node on this way. See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=144.66710&lat=-36.94723&zoom=15

Hi Sam,
Both admin boundaries for relation/8617839 the 'City of Fremantle' and relation/9810808 'Fremantle' are open.

The Malligawad Chinchali Road:
Not all of this road is a bridge... only those bits that have a bridge should be tagged that way. For the moment leave the bridges alone.

From imagery .. part of this 'road' goes across farm fields .. it is little more than a path in those locations. I refer to around 15.2943741, 75.4792762

Keep mapping!

Ok.. 4 months...
I have deleted the crossing section of roof... so some of it will work. Put that on layer=1 because it is on top of the base building?

Building parts can only work on top of a base 'building=*' .. and that base should have the maximum number of floors/levels and height.. not just its own. layers in OSM only go to 5! So I have edited what I think is the base and parts as appropriate. That may help.

Multipolygon member ways should not have the same tags on their member ways
See relation/10210166

Muiltipolygons should not have the members with the same tags on their relations..
See relation/10172714

When you make a multipolygon .. the member ways should not have the same tags on them...

See relation/10296969

Reverted.
This is the very beginning of this river ... The Murry River starts as a spring out of the ground..

They only get to be OSM 'rivers' when they have much more width. The usual OSM difference is a 'river' cannot be jumped over, a stream can.