Warin61's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 63925264 | almost 7 years ago | Hi,
|
| 66738472 | almost 7 years ago | Hi
|
| 66923266 | almost 7 years ago | Hi,
|
| 66896147 | almost 7 years ago | Hi
|
| 66932385 | almost 7 years ago | Hi
|
| 66805589 | almost 7 years ago | HI, way/667489987 overlaps but does not connect to 426262783 |
| 67070164 | almost 7 years ago | Hi,
Relation outer ways should not touch one another. In this case I have added a simple way enclosing all of what I think is used by the hospital and tagged it amenity=hospital with the name. And deleted the relation, the buildings are already tagged as buildings and the hospital is better described as amenity=hospital. Please check the hospital outline - might be smaller than what is there. |
| 65538774 | almost 7 years ago | Add tag building=retail so shop=mall will render. You do need to add tags to those things that have no tags... ---------------
|
| 65904906 | almost 7 years ago | A multiploygon relation can not share outer ways.. https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=138.65113&lat=-34.92011&zoom=12 Show 4 otehr relations with the same problem. And this one will pop up again too... Fix them. ---------------------------------------------- |
| 40562950 | almost 7 years ago | Hi,
|
| 65835569 | almost 7 years ago | Still having problems with relations. relation/9159717 ... one outer way .. but inners within inners ??? Does not make sense. I have changed it ... it can be further enhanced. |
| 60111716 | almost 7 years ago | Hi,
|
| 67008222 | almost 7 years ago | Hi,
This changeset broke the Strathnairn administration Boundary relation. I have restored it by reverting some of this changeset. I think it is ok but best to check.
|
| 19497499 | almost 7 years ago | As the imagery does not show a cycle way .. and the 'cycleway' was entered some 5 years ago.. I don't think there is a cycle way there. What may have occurred it that someone made a 'cycleway' to indicate a route .. that is actual on that road.. but they did not know how to enter it in OSM. There were several of these around Ballarat, I did manage to find the mapper for some of them and have him work on them .. they are now not generating errors so I have not been back to look (in that 'to do list'). This may well be another of them.
At the moment I am tempted to eliminate the cycle way and place the cycle route on the road. Someone may yell - if there actually is a cycle way I hope they do! |
| 66899371 | almost 7 years ago | HI,
|
| 66823203 | almost 7 years ago | Hi
|
| 19497499 | almost 7 years ago | Hi,
Solutions? Remove the cycle way if it does not exist, make the road part of the route for the bicycle route. A short 'cycleway' section to join the road to the cycleway to indicate that you can ride/walk from one to the other. ? Something else? |
| 64562306 | almost 7 years ago | Thank you for your comment. Even more thanks for the mapillary! (PS how do you mount the phone to the bike? I am afraid mine will fall off! Arr not a phone.)
Again .. check it! I have made some changes to the surface tag - concrete at the western end - then asphalt then paved. |
| 65393733 | almost 7 years ago | I have made a start on the southern section of the park. Lots of Slartibartfast going on. One problem is deciding when a tree area stops due to lack of tree density. If zoomed out it all looks dark green, zoom in and there is rock and heath. I'll up load this bit when I have added a few more holes in it. Probably tomorrow. |
| 66762557 | almost 7 years ago | hI. Adding a road over the top of another road does not replace it.
Ref way/30679254 (old) and way/667113475 (new - left turn lane). |