Hi,
It is a little housekeeping.

The Collie connection is a 'spur' - out and back. By placing it separate to the rest of the main track it does make it easier to maintain as a continuous ordered group of ways.

I'm not too fussed about it other than the maintenance issue.

Hi,
Relation: Munda Biddi trail touring route (7527686) is not a national route. It looks to me like an alternate route to Relation: Munda Biddi Trail (5810814).

I'll change the network to local cycling network. But I think it should also be made part of the Relation: Munda Biddi Trail (5810814) and an 'alternative'.

As the Relation: Amy Gillett Track (6915750) only has one member and that member is a route relation (Relation: Amy Gillett Bikeway (3089479) "alt_name"="Adelaide Hills Amy Gillett Rail Trail") I don't see much point in its existence...

I think Relation: Amy Gillett Track (6915750) can be deleted without any loss of information. I have remove the network tag from this relation.

Hi,

I don't think this is a national cycling network .. but either a regional or a local one.

Danny .. that is not something I'd do. It is not the office of a political party. So while it may be closer to the truth than an embassy it is still not correct.
The tagging list have suggested office=government .. as the person does participate in the act of government - even if in opposition.

Early days yet, see what else eventuates.

Doh...

Thanks..

Fixed here - 7 times

1) copyright
2) not verifiable on the ground ..

Hi,

Please don't over lay a path on top of a track!

------------------
A better way of doing these routes . is to make them relations.
The individual tracks and paths may not have names themselves ...
But you can include them in the route relation .. and that way 2 or more route can share the same track/path/whatever.

-------------
Overlays attract the attention of Quality Assurance tools ... and that makes me delete sections! If you want things displayed correctly then they have to be mapped correctly.

Source for the name?

Hi,
Node: Visalink Germany (4362535595) is not an embassy/consulate. It is a commercial firm that 'assists' people to apply for a German visa...

Politicians offices ? Possibly.

I'm targeting embassies without a diplomatic tag and adding that tag .. there are a few that are not embassies .. a school.. possibly brothels etc...

-----------
Presently doing the 'low hanging fruit' .. things in English .. then there are other languages that I should be able to recognize .. French and German .. sand-script will be a challenge.

Message sent to the tagging list.. see what others think (or not).

Oh, you want me to find out how it should be tagged? ok ...I'll get right on it.

In the mean time .. I'll tag it office=politician .. there is 1 other in the data base. Name is now Jane Philpott as it is not all the members of parliament.

Hi,

This is not am embassy!
I have changed it to government=parliament .. but it is probably not that either.
Possibly an office for the local member???

Suggest you do some verification of what tags to use for it.. But it is not the representation of one country inside another country i.e. an embassy.

Hi,
Way: Manoir Blackburn (68609254) you have tagged as an embassy ... what country does it represent in Canada?

Hi,
Node: Canada Members of Parliament (5401362421) .. is not am embassy ...

But what is it?
I have re-tagged it government=parliament .. close as I could go.

Hi,
Abbreviations are not good in OSM. So the name is Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada.

This is not an embassy nor a consulate. It is a government office.

An embassy is not an estate agent...

What country does this embassy represent?

Not an embassy ... if it is what country does it represent?