The relation for the main south railway line looks to be obsolete. Before people added a second track it 'worked; but people have added a second tract and not added it to the relation ... or made a second relation with down and up as appropriate.
This needs a tidy up ... as does most of the rail system here.
Busses are not much better .. number of errors with ways missing or not in sequence.

The 'stops' you added look to be 'train stations'... not platforms or stops ...

Been some months .. I'll delete the 'stops' and simply leave the start and end

Humm further...

The larger area (way/1367194501) carries the tag shop=* and barnd information. I think this is correct,

The relation than duplicates this shop information.

Then the seperat building ways duplicate the brand information.

The guide is 'one feature = one OSM entry' .. here there are 4!

I would delete the relation. Remove the brand and name tags fro the building separate ways ... I think that would be best???

Hi
This does not make sense?
Each way is tagged as a building - making them seperate buildings.
The relation also tags tham as a building - a single building.
Which is it???
Next issue .. a multipolygon relation outer ways cannot share segments.. as in what I assume is a common wall shared between the two? buildings.

HI,
place=farm on a node does not render, possibly with a name it will.
My personal preference is to tag a way for the homestead as building=farm possibly with a name from DCS Base Map. The farm name is probably the same but as a node it contains not much information, the building at leasts indicates a place of contact.

HI,
place=farm on a node does not render, possibly with a name it will.
My personal preference is to tag a way for the homestead as building=farm possibly with a name from DCS Base Map. The farm name is probably the same but as a node it contains not much information, the building at leasts indicates a place of contact.

Hi,
Is the Five Rivers restaurant still here? Or has the Bhutan restaurant taken its place?
I have entered the Bhutan res. and left the Five Rivers .. please delete the one on there?

Ok , I'll change it back..

Road is open to local residents.
Re tagged as
motor_vehicle=private
highway=residential

Hi,
The school does not only occupy the buildings but also the grounds. The school boundary can be found in the DCS Base Map. I have made the change.

I occasionally check with https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=146.08876&lat=-37.13979&zoom=9&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=ptv2_routes_valid%2Cptv2_routes_invalid%2Cptv2_error_ways%2Cptv2_error_nodes%2Cptv2_routes_valid%2Cptv2_routes_invalid%2Cptv2_error_ways%2Cptv2_error_nodes

I mainly check the long distance routes eg Syd to Perth

I have moved the 'stops' to the start of the relation/2963173. Rather than use the station building .. use the platforms with role platform...

Hi,
Stops should be at the very beginning of a route relation...
relation/2963173 ... looks to be Melb 2 Melb via Albury ... doubles back on it self.... I have tried to correct this ... now no back tracking and a continuous line.

Train route relation/3134294 - Indian Pacific restored. Other train route relations may also need attention?

This one just stuck out. I tried to contact the original mapper and have not response for serval weeks and so .. deleted.
If you know of others it would be worthwhile to contact the author and see what they say .. if no response after several weeks go ahead and delete them.

HI,
This does not look to form a single route? Might be a collection of ways that a government website uses to generate a route?

Meryla Flora Reserve nee State Forest - open.
https://www.nationalparks.nsw.gov.au/visit-a-park/parks/meryla-flora-reserve

Hi,
Fire trails that are navigatable by vehicles are not OSM paths but tracks as a minimum. The access may be restricted using the access tag, that could be motor_vehicle=private to indicate that management vehicles could use the track while the general public could be excluded.

Hi
Is the pub now closed?

Hi,
The 'Bruce Ridge MTB Trails' relation/5341192 looks to me like a collection of mtb routes? And each of these routes now have their own relation? In short I think the relation/5341192 can be deleted .. as each individual route is now mapped and a route relation should be a single route not a collection?