And the unincorporated relation is broken at the Macquarie Lighthouse...

Also breaks the relation for the Sydney Harbor National Park.

And what source has been used???

Car parking down not extend to the pedestrian crossings...

I have detailed the car parking in this area.

Welcome to OSM!

The relation of the Barr Smith reading room is wrong; multipolygon outer ways cannot share segments... I take it the two member ways have different levels??? Tag each way as builing part with the correct levels .. and then...

The Way: Barr Smith Library (678979212) looks to be the 'reading room' ... and would be best tagged with amenity=library.. and 'reading room'???

Still broken.
21 The Entrance North to Gosford, Way members unordered or missing

Multipolygon outer ways cannot share the same segments.
See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=151.20230&lat=-33.85839&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

Possibly a site relation could be used.

The 'fix' applied to Way: 274800080 has the road go over the top of a building. The truth is it goes along side the building!

Either move the road or move the buildings! From the location of the local roads it looks to me like the buildings should be moved to the bing imagery location...

I have applied this 'fix' - removed layer=1 on the road, moved the buildings...

Hi,
Stop positions must be on a train line way .. and be part of, connected to, that way.
node/8382297622 Keon Park is not on a train line... see node/8382297622

Bus route 259 - Macquarie Park...

I have re-sequenced the ways

I have added public_transport=platform to some 18 bus stops .. looks to be a common error

There are a number of these faulty bus routes.. this one has not been touched for some 2 months. This one may now be fixed.

Ok,
So "update bus route 766 and separate into 2 relations for each direction" could be a better changeset comment.. I think..

Hi,
Welcome to OSM!

Please make your changeset comments more descriptive... I see no 766 thing here .. Bus 612 and Box Hill Station yes... but no 766.
See osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Hi
The relation/562702 has no closed outer and needs to be fixed.
relation/562702#map=14/-3.9604/141.3128
Note both outer ways have been modified by you...

Hi,
Welcome to OSM!

A relation is not required for a simple building, this has been deleted and the building mapping corrected. . see way/1286513534

Most buildings are 'square' meaning they have 90 degree corners. You can 'square' a selected object by pressing the 'Q' key.

Most residential buildings here are houses, so a better tag would be building=house.

Hope that helps.

There are a lot of over lapping tree areas here. ...
These individual tree ways make it very difficult to add detail in these trees area.

I am trying to improve the mapping along the bib track before I go.

------------------
This entry is from 13 years ago, at this time OSM has access to more data .. and that data suggest this entry can be deleted as far as the 'Nature Reserve' is concerned as it is now better represented by another more upto date entry.

I am simply asking for your opinion.

Further there is NO requirement for anyone to be 'local' to map in an are. Just look at HOT. Get over it.

I have altered this as suggested above... howevere it look like it maybe a duplication of a later entry for Westralia Conservation Park ... see relation/12949956

This 'Nature Reserve' ???? Previously tagged 'Wellington National Park'... Ummm is it a "nature reserve' (that would be tagged leisure=nature_reserve" ???

The 'name' appears to be a generic descriptive ...

Arr .. I see the PSMA data is not up to date. But the DCS Base Map is correct and shows more detail than you have entered...

Bradfield is;

Viewable on the DCS Base Map.

Downloadable from the PSMA data which is where most admin boundaries in OSM come from... and are much easier to enter into OSM from that source. See the OSM wiki for the Australian Data Catalog

Hi,
Not a good idea to add the tree tag to a National Park...
Not all the National Park is covered by trees leading some mappers to make holes where there are not tree .. thus making holes in the National Park
At d=some place the trees may extend beyond the National Park .. mappers then extend the National Park...

Best? Make a new multipolygon relation for the trees... Can still have some extend the National Park where the outer ways are common to both tree are and Park area.

I have added a crude tree relation for this area. Please make changes to suit. relation/17613045

Hi
Considering how long these 'proposals' have now existed and existed into the past .. I don't think these will come to pass in our life times.. not something worth mapping?